English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or a hoax?

It edited out the plane flying into the building, yet shows that tower section exploding for no, apparent reason. Maybe that video caught the plane using a cloaking device.

2007-03-27 17:28:15 · 8 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government Politics

.
The video clearly shows the section above the plane crash collapsing strait down, into the remaining section of the tower. The collapse continues strait down as the building was not designed to support a 20 ton aircraft coupled with the initial vibration caused by the impact.
.

2007-03-27 17:31:49 · update #1

- the real video clearly shows... - (above)

2007-03-27 17:32:44 · update #2

I guess they knew EXACTLY what altitude the planes would hit the towers to fake the collapse of both buildings.

They must of asked the air traffic controllers to plot a trajectory and set off the explosives at just the right height.

2007-03-27 17:36:18 · update #3

The vibration alone would have sheared the bolt heads off of every beam from the initial impact. You learn these things installing radar sites for the government.

2007-03-27 17:38:40 · update #4

As one who worked commercial avionics for a few years, airframes are made up of a titanium allow. It does not give willingly. When titanium meets steel, steel will always lose.

2007-03-27 17:42:03 · update #5

How many players would it take to pull it off? Nixon nor Clinton could keep a simple infraction a secret. You would have to have thousands of people involved to pull off a conspiracy of such magnitude. And raise zero suspicion while in the making. Good luck.

2007-03-27 17:46:42 · update #6

What if the passengers fought the terrorists and no planes hit the buildings? Would they have blown them up anyway and claim a meteorite did it?

2007-03-27 17:49:56 · update #7

8 answers

I have no idea, have refused to watch it. I have spoken with people who were less than a few blocks from the Pentagon and WTC's when they were hit.

I find the conspiracy theory to be laughable, if it wasn't so cruel.

And two of the pilots trained at a small airport in Venice, Florida, where my dad owns condos (a block away). He is pretty sure they tried to rent one from him for 2 weeks, but he turned them down for a longer rental.

2007-03-27 17:34:44 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 3 1

There are many laws of physics and gravity and logic that clearly punch holes in the official story. But the alarmist attitudes from conspiracy theorists as well as their histrionic presentations are causing people to ignore facts.

There are truths on both sides and when and if it is ever discussed rationally, then people will be open to the horrific truths that really occurred.

Like WTC-7 that was not hit by a plane and fell like the rest of the buildings. WTC-7 contained all of the investigative files on all of the big corporate con-scams like Enron and the California Power Scam. All evidence and files- gone-POOF!

Now all of these corporate criminals will win their appeals. That is a fact!

There are a dozen or so demolition experts who could handle a job like WTC and they all expressed the same opinion. It was controlled demolitions.

These facts alone are enough for me to go searching for some answers.

I hope that one day we will find out the complete story, but I doubt it will happen.

Most people will never be able to comprehend or believe that government officials and corporation would ever do something like this to Americans.

Its called arrogance and it is very pervasive throughout our countryside.

For me, I thinks it's a lot of both (cover-up and hoax).

2007-03-27 17:45:53 · answer #2 · answered by darrellkern 3 · 2 2

Yesterday the Nat. Geo. channel showed firemen working around a jet engine at the Pentagon. The C.T.'s probably think that was planted. It's no proof except that some Harvard freshmen know how to use video equipment. I wonder if they could edit out my ex-wife on some I have.

2007-03-27 17:39:53 · answer #3 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 0 0

LOL a cloaking device... Star Trek marathon... man I could use that.

My favorite fact to point out to the CTs is that if 93 and 77 were not airplanes, where are the flight crews and passengers today?

2007-03-27 17:32:21 · answer #4 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 4 0

There is no video. Show the video. The planes hit the buildings. I think everyone will agree on that.

2007-03-27 17:32:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

No, it is not proof..............it is just another way to convince gullible people to act against the government.

2007-03-27 17:35:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Maybe the video of this particular witness was shot from a different angle which blocked the plane b/c it was behind the WTC...I dunno, just a thought. Would love to see your "doctored" video link...just to have a look-see. Thanks.

2007-03-27 18:50:37 · answer #7 · answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6 · 0 2

No, its proof of massive amounts of stupidty within our country.

2007-03-27 18:49:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers