English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Interestingly, the burden of proof is no longer on the "conspiracy theorists" but on those who have stood by the government's official claim that 19 hijackers with plastic box-cutters financed by Bin Laden, out smarted the CIA, FBI, NSA, FAA, The Pentagon, and our Multi Trillion Dollar High Tech Military by crashing 4 planes without any intervention.

The following is fact and is irrefutable:

FACT: Bin Laden is NOT wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks. Check out the FBI web site. Reason? They don't have sufficient evidence to convict him. Perhaps this is why Bush said he really doesn't care if we catch him or not.

FACT: There are hundreds of televised claims from the morning of the attacks saying that witnesses heard or felt explosions prior to the collapse of the towers. These include firefighters, police, news reporters, security guards, employees of the WTC and civilians.

FACT: 47 story - WTC 7, we are told, collapsed from fire alone. This was unprecedented for a concrete and steel frame building. Furthermore, it fell symmetrically at free fall speed. Science and deductive reasoning will easily support the cause of this collapse as DEMOLITION. Fire does not have the energy to do this. Besides, Larry Silverstein declared on TV that they “pulled” building 7.

FACT: The steel from WTC was shipped overseas before an investigation was even opened. This is the greatest destruction of evidence and malpractice in the history of forensics.

FACT: Thousands of first responders have been afflicted and some have even died from respiratory failure. The government will not support investigations into the many reports which show that these heroes have micronized steel, glass, and concrete in their lungs. Fire, and the collapse from gravity would not produce this type of dust. Demolitions, however, supports the evidence.

FACT: We were told that NORAD didn't intercept any of the planes that day. This spans from about 8:24 A.M, the time of the first report of a hijacking, to 10:06, when the last plane crashed in Shanksville Penn. NORAD has a prior track record of intercepting planes within minutes. Standard Operating Procedure was not followed that day. The Bush Administration changed their story several times. We must also look at the fact that President Bush ordered Cheney to take control over NORAD the morning of the attacks.

FACT: The investigation into 9/11 was initially opposed by the Bush Administration. The 9/11 families pressed for one. They got it, but with remarkable conditions. The total costs of the investigation, including the NIST report, was only $16 million. The cost to investigate the Space Shuttle crash - $50 million. The cost to investigate Clinton - $42 million. In other words, the greatest failure of our defenses deserved less money than the shuttle and Clinton's perjury. What an insult to the 9/11 families and the loss of their loved ones.

FACT: No one has been fired for the failures of 9/11.

FACT: Right before the attack a spike in “put options” on Boeing, United Airlines, and American Airlines increased dramatically and was never investigated. Millions are still unclaimed. This indicates people knew in advance. Why didn’t the FBI check out these leads?

FACT: In August 6, 2001 A Public Daily Briefing Memo that was titled BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE IN THE US was brought forward. Yet prior to its declassification, we were told by Rice and Fleisher that there were no warnings. Had this news been made public, couldn't travelers, law enforcement, and airline workers have been a little more guarded or informed to notice something that day? Wouldn't we have guessed right away that the first report of a hijacking was indeed a terrorist? Or would we have dismissed it as "one bad pilot" and continued to read "My Pet Goat" while America was attacked?

FACT: When the United States is under attack the first measure is to secure the President.
The entire nation knew 2 weeks in advance that President Bush would be at Booker Elementary Grade School. Why did his body guards and secret service men let him remain at this location for 20 minutes after the attack? Holding the book “My Pet Goat” upside down while he tried to address a bunch of 5th grade students?

The bottom line is - If the deaths of 3000 people occurred under the control of a corporation, people would have been brought up on charges of criminal negligence. Immediately! Despite the growing movement and mounting evidence into the WTC collapses, the government still has made up its mind that it is fire that brought these buildings down and that 9/11 was simply a failure of imagination. They feel no one is to blame. This was the conclusion they had prior to the investigation. What the 9/11 Commission produced is the anti-thesis of the scientific method. Much of the evidence was outright omitted. Since they determined the conclusion prematurely. Do you understand?

If you were an underwriter at an insurance company, or an architectural engineer, or a fire marshal, wouldn't you want to know what really happened in these buildings? If you were a pilot, or an FAA employee, wouldn't you want to know which NORAD employee stood down, failed to requisition intervention or just plain messed up that day?

To dismiss the overwhelming evidence that explicitly shows how hundreds of questions remain unanswered suggests a cover-up by our government. Conservative thinking has taught us to keep government in check 100% of the time.

More and more people are joining the 9/11 truth movement. We are unstoppable. To deny the smidgeon of facts presented here and the many others unmentioned is akin to being like those who have denied the Holocaust. It's intellectually dishonest.

Go ahead and give this a thumbs down if your Patriotism is of the cheapest kind. Yours is the kind that our forefathers would have laughed at. They demanded that we question authority, as they did. Our Constitution provides us with the means to explore the truth and to keep the government in check. But even the Constitution has been threatened as of late.

So, give it a thumbs down if you wish to cling to your Cheap Patriotism and your unconditional loyalty to a President and a Government that has demonstrated nothing but contempt for Accountability, Truth, Constitution, and most importantly - the 9/11 victims, their families and surviving rescue workers who continue to suffer the loss of their loved ones.

Peace, may the truth be brought forward and the guilty be brought to justice.

2007-03-27 17:15:30 · 23 answers · asked by Surfer Dude 2 in Politics & Government Politics

23 answers

From your mouth to God's ear. I can't begin to tell you how refreshing it is for me to feel your patriotism so blatant and pure it almost makes me want to cry. America, your wake up call is here, truth is unwavering and definite in it's cause, so prepare for the loss of your country to the neocons and prepare your minds and bodies to slavery because the beautifull you are no more but your strenght in mind and in spirit have failed you. You've allowed yourself to be puppeteered by a mass media blanket that is owned by corporations who's only goal is cold cash. It must end and it must be you, America, who strikes at these falls prophets and money mungers who've takin' controll of you like a pimp, 'cause if you haven't noticed we're being sold to the highest bidder. So unless you want to be a cheap whore allowing your soul and pride to be sold, you must stand and fight , fight , fight just like our men and woman of our ( not theirs) armed forces. God speed.

2007-03-27 18:05:41 · answer #1 · answered by realist 1 · 2 1

FACT: The FBI deals with domestic issues, not international ones. The capture of Osama bin Laden would fall under to the CIA, not the FBI.

FACT: A nearly 120 story building collapsing under its own weight will sound like an explosion. There was also no evidence of explosives found.

FACT: The seismic waves created by the collapse of the Twin Towers significantly weakened this structure. There is also no evidence to support the controlled demotion hypothesis.

FACT: No evidence to support the claim that steel was shipped overseas.

FACT: One 120-story building collapsing WILL pulverize concrete. There would also be other potentially hazardous construction materials, like asbestos and fiberglass insulation, which no doubt were used in the construction of the World Trade Center towers.

FACT: No evidence to support the claim that Bush ordered Cheney to take control of NORAD.

FACT: The investigation into the 9/11 attacks done by the 9/11 commission was a bipartisan and commonly accepted report. More money does not mean more accuarte.

FACT: To the best of my knowledge, you may be accurate that no one has been fired in the wake of the intelligence failures of 9/11. Many have resigned from their jobs since 9/11 however.

FACT: There had been daily briefings for years about the potential danger that bin Laden posed to the United States. Read the 9/11 Commission's report, you will see that this memo is really nothing new or shocking. Clinton had the exact same intelligence.

FACT: There is really no evidence to support the claim that Bush orchestrated, carried out, planned, or was in any way involved with the 9/11 attacks. Since your view is not the commonly held view, the burden of proof to provide such evidence is most definitely on your shoulders.

2007-03-28 00:38:56 · answer #2 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 5 3

Why don't you apply your brain to all this stuff. What is the motive for the President and others to do this? How did they gain from it? A plane full of fuel will make a pretty big boom.
There are no set rules about how a building must fall down.
Give it up!

2007-03-28 00:30:27 · answer #3 · answered by maybelline512 3 · 4 1

Facts would be better than that doctored WTC video on utube.

It shows one of the towers exploding. Yet it edited out the plane hitting the building. What a joke. One of the conspiracy believers had this video linked from their YA post as evidence.

2007-03-28 00:21:56 · answer #4 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 10 3

You know, your facts are just flat out wrong. Bin Laden is, in fact, on the FBI's top ten. Check it for yourself.

None of the rhetoric you've laid out here, continuously, is fact, just opinion.

2007-03-28 00:30:46 · answer #5 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 5 1

Stating that a fact is "irrefutable" does not make it so. Only things that are not up for discussion and proven are irrefutable. Things such as the water is wet, the sky is blue, you're out of your f*cking mind, and dairy gives me gas. Those are facts, not a list of cut and paste garbage from a nut jobs website.

2007-03-28 00:25:54 · answer #6 · answered by Tucson Hooligan 4 · 9 2

God bless you young man you are a true patriot. Our country needs more young men like yourself who are not afraid to shout the truth from the roof tops. I have copied your entire question here and plan on using it as answers to many of these Bushtards tongue in cheek requests of proof of wrong doings by this criminal administration.
God Bless you and your family, and may we redeem this once great land.

2007-03-28 02:49:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

FACT: Both the official FEMA and NIST reports cannot explain the collapse of WTC 7, but both say it was unlikely due to fire.

So why did WTC 7 just implode into a pile?

2007-03-28 00:30:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

I don't see irrefutible facts, I see a lot of opinions and information probably gotten from 9/11 conspiracy websites.....try again.

2007-03-28 00:24:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 7 2

This is all very interesting. I am no fan of Bush but I do recommend you cite your references for what you write. If you don't you will be challenged by the neocons with a vengence. However if you have cited your references and they show clearly that what you say is correct there really isn't much more they can do but whine.

2007-03-28 00:20:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 4

fedest.com, questions and answers