Liberals Why are you hung up on President Bush and his guard service?

Question

When Clinton recieved a free pass fleeing to Canada to avoid the military?

Or is this more in the common interest of Liberals, you know cowardism?

Answer 1

What Guard service? He signed up then went awol.
Clinton got a student deferral. He was a Rhodes Scholar.
Bush couldn't read 'My Pet Goat' right side up.

Answer 2

First off, cowardism isn't a word. You might be looking for cowardice?
And secondly, Clinton was heavily criticized for his avoidance of the draft. It was one of the major issues he faced during both of his campaigns.
I, being liberal, don't have a blind faith to liberal leaders whom can still have faults, as most can probably have picked up on with Clinton whose infidelity and other assorted controversies brought him a lot of negative press over the last few years of his presidency?
Lastly, when have you seen liberals being hung up on Bush's guard service recently? Everybody knows that he got a prime spot in the service, and everybody knows that Clinton avoided the draft. No point in beating a dead horse. Or rather, in this case, a lame duck.

Answer 3

First off, Clinton was in England on a student deferment (along with people like Bill O'Reilly), not Canada.

As for Bush's National Guard "service," it doesn't take a "Liberal" to realize the level of cowardice he displayed while others went to fight in his place.

Why does it matter? Because this gutless wimp continues to sacrifice truly brave Americans in an attempt to secure a positive legacy while pushing an illegitimate and wholly un-American (neocon) agenda.

.

Answer 4

George Bush joined the national look after. on the time of the vietnam conflict, the feds did not use national look after troops distant places. that's a modern-day phenomenon. transforming into a member of the national look after grew to become right into a manner of keeping off service. the U. S. experienced him as a pilot, extremely high priced, and then he desperate he could fly not extra, coincidentally refusing to look at a actual. officers do not understand the place he grew to become into, and he had no lively accountability standards. they'd produce no documents of what he did in the service for the full final 300 and sixty 5 days. (he does not point out what years his drug historic previous grew to become into). Clinton did not serve, and admits it. Cheney draft dodged his *** off. And he's a hypocritical hawk. Bush wasted the government preparation qand relied upon dad's impact to make certain to it he did no genuine service. he's a liar.

Answer 5

Your question is a red herring. The real comparison is Bush, AWOL from his guard duties versus John Kerry, war hero. The difference between Clinton is that under Clinton the country was at peace and prosperous and under Bush we are spending billions on war, losing brave soldiers and are subjected to a scandal of the month administration. It couldn't be more obvious.

FYI, the stock market went up almost 6,000 points under Clinton and has been almost level under Bush.

Answer 6

What guard service? The only guard service he ever did was guarding the keg at his frat boy parties.

Answer 7

Two reasons, one to emphasise that he is not the war hero his supporters seem to think he is. Secondly because Cons keep on and on and on with the Clinton and bimbo thing.

Answer 8

who's hung up,, he went AWOL,, his daddy had it expunged from his record,, he got drunk for a year,,, he is a coward,, not man enough to tell the truth then,, or now,, Bush is a habitual liar..

I DID NOT TOPPLE THAT MAN, MR. HUSSEIN,,,

it depends on your definition of INVASION,,,

Answer 9

Clinton opposed the war and felt it was immoral. Supposedly Shrub and Dead Eye Dick supported the war yet both were AWOL.....

Answer 10

Libs are cowards. They didn't even serve under Clinton.