People who support, please be specific in giving your reason./s
2007-03-27 16:17:39 · 6 answers · asked by Pretty_in_punk 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Zoology
Support, only if the experiments can help humans like finding a cure for AIDS.
2007-03-27 17:30:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
for the reason that i'm on right here i will help out a fellow pupil. I took an Ethics type and had to respond to same question, because it grow to be slightly of the path. Theirs alot a distinctive motives. First you are able to take the case that one and all existence on planet earth is right here for human beings excitement, so in case you suspect that than Animal Extermination is ethical by using fact it promotes human excitement from, curing maximum cancers to better hand creams. you should circulate with survival attitude that it relies upon on existence and loss of existence, that without Animal Experimentation human beings will die. Does a RAT's have a similar worth as a Human existence? maximum folk might circulate with human existence via the way. So for the reason that human existence is worth better than animal existence animal experimentation ought to stay. Now philosophy all existence has a similar worth. lower back you are able to stretch the actuality slightly and declare killing rats evens issues out. Sorry I lost hyperlink to that one, yet that concept is out their. Yeah the guy up their is acceptable besides. might you're taking a sparkling experimental drug and attempt it on a human first? No, by using fact Human existence has extra value than an animals existence. Animal Experimentation saves lives. exceedingly lots saving human existence is the basic win on Ethics.
2016-10-20 02:44:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i only would support if it was to save a human or animal life, i would be strongly against cosmetic research an such. but even the fact that it would save a life still means the animal should be treated with respect an comfort. i think some of those labs dont consider that . but im sure there are some that do
2007-03-27 21:06:42 · answer #3 · answered by peeps you 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Against. Pets and animals are part of the family. So will it be okay to experiment on our children or elderly next?
2007-03-27 16:25:10 · answer #4 · answered by tafesplace 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the only aspect of animal experimentation i would support would be testing which sauce is best on which animal. other than that, it's all messed up.
2007-03-27 16:21:37 · answer #5 · answered by wrldzgr8stdad 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
against to a certain point
2007-03-27 16:25:14 · answer #6 · answered by beadsandbraids 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋