English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-27 16:07:43 · 14 answers · asked by vegaswoman 6 in Politics & Government Politics

I find it hilarious that a person who creates multiple accounts to spam conspiracy theories can call me a sheep girl. Stop stealing my oxygen Nancy. You are not worthy.

2007-03-27 16:16:35 · update #1

The Next J, I agree with you. Yahoo Answers has turned a blind eye. I assume they encourage trolls by their lack of action.

2007-03-27 16:34:02 · update #2

"Lady" can you give us a link to support your statement that about the percentage of people who agree with you? I double dawg dare you to post your statistics.

2007-03-27 16:39:19 · update #3

"Lady", when you state your statistics you may not include the opinions of your multiple accounts. That would cheating.

2007-03-27 16:41:33 · update #4

I feel honored. Two of the Nancy accounts have chosen to respond to my question. Is that desperation I smell?

2007-03-27 16:43:14 · update #5

Make that 3 now, surferdude is also a troll account. Maybe I can set a record for troll responses.

2007-03-27 16:44:25 · update #6

14 answers

No.

They seem to believe that if they repeat their "theories" often enough, that somehow, they will become reality. And, in becoming reality, that somehow their world will be more secure.

Why else would they feel the need to adopt multiple screen names and accounts to ask the same questions over and over and over?

In observing the board over the past couple of months, it is evident that most of the "conspiracy" oriented questions are the work of one individual. (Nancy, Surfer Dude, Sgt BMF, Ginger, Brenda, Crypto Jew Girl, Luke F, Skippy, Susi Q, Lori, Larry Silverstein, ladyofnyc, multiple symbols, etc.)

What amazes me is that Yahoo permits this to continue.

2007-03-27 16:31:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Surfer Dude, you are just wrong. Your facts are wrong and you refuse to see it. You're what I like to call a "perpetual victim." You always thinks someone is out to get you. That there are secrets everywhere. That the government can't be trusted. And that there is a conspiracy at every corner.

Be honest, WHAT POSSIBLE REASON DOES THE US GOV'T HAVE TO HARM AND LIE TO ITS CITIZENS?

No, it's not for power. Because power only matters when you can flaunt it. It you are lying and keeping it secret, you can't flaunt it ... Try again!

2007-03-27 23:49:33 · answer #2 · answered by janine_says 2 · 2 0

Of course people will never agree with them...not because they are necessarily wrong, but because people don't like to have their views challenged and prefer to sit in the "comfort zone". I bought the original story at first myself, but things never really sat right with me. As more stuff came out, the more Bush blocked investigations, the subsequent conveinent wars with the rhetoric...well, it got me thinking. I have looked at both sides of the argument. I have read the 9/11 commission report, I have looked at conspiracy sites and I have looked at de-bunking the conspiracy sites...and after my honest assessment, I still feel there are too many inconsistencies and way too many unanswered questions. Just because most people won't and don't want to ask questions does sadden me b/c well, I would like to think that we are a country of patriots who would not fear asking questions of our government (which is supposed to serve at our pleasure). You can call me a whack-job all you want, you are only playing into their hands and truthfully your positions are only predictable.


"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."

--Hermann Goering(1893-1946) Commander-in-Chief of the Luftwaffe, President of the Reichstag, Prime Minister of Prussia and, as Hitler's designated successor, the second man in the Third Reich.

2007-03-27 23:25:22 · answer #3 · answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6 · 2 3

No they view the majority as the vast right wing conspiracy

2007-03-28 06:00:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

They will agree with us when 9/11 is exposed for what it is- an inside job. Did you ever realize that non conspiracy types can never answer the majority of questions asked. None of them know the facts, so they use ad homenin attacks to somehow justify their answer.

2007-03-27 23:40:31 · answer #5 · answered by Luke F 3 · 2 3

No because if they realized people were starting to agree with them, then they would think THAT was a conspiracy too! It's a lose/lose situation for them all around.

2007-03-27 23:16:20 · answer #6 · answered by pinkluxe 3 · 3 2

Put this in your pipe and smoke it...

Or are you too lazy to read it.

To all those who give the thumbs down to a answer like this, or use the juvenile retort of "conspiracy-nut job," please, take some time to seriously analyze the unanswered questions surrounding the 9/11 attacks.

Interestingly, the burden of proof is no longer on the "conspiracy theorists" but on those who have stood by the government's official claim that 19 hijackers with plastic box-cutters financed by Bin Laden, out smarted the CIA, FBI, NSA, FAA, The Pentagon, and our Multi Trillion Dollar High Tech Military by crashing 4 planes without any intervention.

The following is fact, has been proven and is irrefutable:

FACT: Bin Laden is NOT wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks. Check out the FBI web site. Reason? They don't have sufficient evidence to convict him. Perhaps this is why Bush said he really doesn't care if we catch him or not.

FACT: There are hundreds of televised claims from the morning of the attacks saying that witnesses heard or felt explosions prior to the collapse of the towers. These include firefighters, police, news reporters, security guards, employees of the WTC and civilians.

FACT: 47 story - WTC 7, we are told, collapsed from fire alone. This was unprecedented for a concrete and steel frame building. Furthermore, it fell symmetrically at free fall speed. Science and deductive reasoning will easily support the cause of this collapse as DEMOLITION. Fire does not have the energy to do this. Besides, Larry Silverstein declared on TV that they “pulled” building 7.

FACT: The steel from WTC was shipped overseas before an investigation was even opened. This is the greatest destruction of evidence and malpractice in the history of forensics.

FACT: Thousands of first responders have been afflicted and some have even died from respiratory failure. The government will not support investigations into the many reports which show that these heroes have micronized steel, glass, and concrete in their lungs. Fire, and the collapse from gravity would not produce this type of dust. Demolitions, however, supports the evidence.

FACT: We were told that NORAD didn't intercept any of the planes that day. This spans from about 8:24 A.M, the time of the first report of a hijacking, to 10:06, when the last plane crashed in Shanksville Penn. NORAD has a prior track record of intercepting planes within minutes. Standard Operating Procedure was not followed that day. The Bush Administration changed their story several times. We must also look at the fact that President Bush ordered Cheney to take control over NORAD the morning of the attacks.

FACT: The investigation into 9/11 was initially opposed by the Bush Administration. The 9/11 families pressed for one. They got it, but with remarkable conditions. The total costs of the investigation, including the NIST report, was only $16 million. The cost to investigate the Space Shuttle crash - $50 million. The cost to investigate Clinton - $42 million. In other words, the greatest failure of our defenses deserved less money than the shuttle and Clinton's perjury. What an insult to the 9/11 families and the loss of their loved ones.

FACT: No one has been fired for the failures of 9/11.

FACT: Right before the attack a spike in “put options” on Boeing, United Airlines, and American Airlines increased dramatically and was never investigated. Millions are still unclaimed. This indicates people knew in advance. Why didn’t the FBI check out these leads?

FACT: In August 6, 2001 A Public Daily Briefing Memo that was titled BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE IN THE US was brought forward. Yet prior to its declassification, we were told by Rice and Fleisher that there were no warnings. Had this news been made public, couldn't travelers, law enforcement, and airline workers have been a little more guarded or informed to notice something that day? Wouldn't we have guessed right away that the first report of a hijacking was indeed a terrorist? Or would we have dismissed it as "one bad pilot" and continued to read "My Pet Goat" while America was attacked?

FACT: When the United States is under attack the first measure is to secure the President.
The entire nation knew 2 weeks in advance that President Bush would be at Booker Elementary Grade School. Why did his body guards and secret service men let him remain at this location for 20 minutes after the attack? Holding the book “My Pet Goat” upside down while he tried to address a bunch of 5th grade students?

The bottom line is - If the deaths of 3000 people occurred under the control of a corporation, people would have been brought up on charges of criminal negligence. Immediately! Despite the growing movement and mounting evidence into the WTC collapses, the government still has made up its mind that it is fire that brought these buildings down and that 9/11 was simply a failure of imagination. They feel no one is to blame. This was the conclusion they had prior to the investigation. What the 9/11 Commission produced is the anti-thesis of the scientific method. Much of the evidence was outright omitted. Since they determined the conclusion prematurely. Do you understand?

If you were an underwriter at an insurance company, or an architectural engineer, or a fire marshal, wouldn't you want to know what really happened in these buildings? If you were a pilot, or an FAA employee, wouldn't you want to know which NORAD employee stood down, failed to requisition intervention or just plain messed up that day?

To dismiss the overwhelming evidence that explicitly shows how hundreds of questions remain unanswered suggests a cover-up by our government. Conservative thinking has taught us to keep government in check 100% of the time.

More and more people are joining the 9/11 truth movement. We are unstoppable. To deny the smidgeon of facts presented here and the many others unmentioned is akin to being like those who have denied the Holocaust. It's intellectually dishonest.

Go ahead and give this a thumbs down if your Patriotism is of the cheapest kind. Yours is the kind that our forefathers would have laughed at. They demanded that we question authority, as they did. Our Constitution provides us with the means to explore the truth and to keep the government in check. But even the Constitution has been threatened as of late.

So, give it a thumbs down if you wish to cling to your Cheap Patriotism and your unconditional loyalty to a President and a Government that has demonstrated nothing but contempt for Accountability, Truth, Constitution, and most importantly - the 9/11 victims, their families and surviving rescue workers who continue to suffer the loss of their loved ones.

Peace, may the truth be brought forward and the guilty be brought to justice.

Source(s):
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=7...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...
Credit to Rob in NY.

2007-03-27 23:41:54 · answer #7 · answered by Surfer Dude 2 · 0 3

and opening a new account everyday to spam it does nothing to convert anyone.

2007-03-27 23:12:12 · answer #8 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 8 3

They dwell in their own world.

2007-03-27 23:14:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

6% of the american population still think we never landed on the moon. so no they will never realize it...

2007-03-27 23:12:01 · answer #10 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 6 4

fedest.com, questions and answers