I want to be induced because I want the baby to share her sisters birthday....
2007-03-27 16:04:28 · 16 answers · asked by Foxtrot 2 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Pregnancy
im sorry but its not considered full term, 37-42 weeks is. And wanting to be induced for a reason like that is just silly girl. let yor baby do all its growing and best care while its inside of you. the safest place to be, untill its ready to come out its self.
dont you think it deserves its own special day.
2007-03-27 16:13:47 · answer #1 · answered by Soon2bMrsM 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, 37 weeks is considered full term. Most doctors will not induce without a medical reason for doing so. Your child could be born with complications of early birth at this point, so unless it happens beyond your control, it is best for the baby to wait. A shared birthday is not worth risking your baby's health.
2007-03-27 17:52:06 · answer #2 · answered by Krissi 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First, why would you want your two children to have the same birthday? They are two completely different individuals and it will only cause a lot of disagreements in the future. And when I was pregnant 37 weeks was considered full term. Sorry.Hope this doesn't upset you. If everything is going well your doctor might not want to induce you for no good reason. Good Luck!
2007-03-27 16:15:24 · answer #3 · answered by newfiemomma 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
A "normal" fullterm gestation period is from 32 to 42 weeks...so yeah 36 weeks is full term...however your doctor will determin if it is HEALTHY for the baby to induce and not based on because you want your daughters to share birthdays. (who would want that anyway? Poor kids never having a birthday of their own to celebrate?) That's as bad as being born on Christmas Day!
2007-03-27 19:29:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no doctor will induce you at 36 week unless there's something wrong and plus 36 weeks is not full term now if you go into labor naturally the will take the baby but not till your full term at 40 weeks only them will they induce labor. plus let your other daughter have her own birthday it's supposed to be special for her. i have twins and they fight all the time because they share the same birthday. just let nature run it's natural corse
2007-03-27 16:15:18 · answer #5 · answered by Mrs. CuTT 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
you're seen finished term at 37 weeks yet at 36 weeks they think approximately it completely secure to grant your infant and could no longer do something to provide up hard artwork. 40 weeks is approximately how long our bodies oftentimes save the infant interior for some reason, it wasn't chosen via docs/scientists. examine has shown that once 37 weeks the infant is totally progressed in spite of the incontrovertible fact that and those final 3 weeks the infant purely oftentimes places on fairly extra fat and stuff. Ultrasound relationship is often 2 weeks off the two way (you should relatively be 2 weeks further alongside or further in the back of then you definately think of) so as that's yet one extra reason for them to enable the infant come at 36-37 weeks. it particularly is carefully prevalent to have the infant in the previous or after your due date. Your due date is purely a coarse estimate as to while the infant will arrive.
2016-10-20 02:43:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please don't have an induction for such a ridiculous reason! Your baby deserves her own birthday. Plus, you want the baby to stay in as long as possible to insure she's as healthy as possible. This is such a selfish reason to get induced. Not to mention how much more painful it is to be induced than to go into labor naturally, trust me, I know. I was induced at 39w4d because my son was so big and wouldn't come out of my ribcage and I couldn't breathe. If you don't have a good excuse other than this, than you should not do it. Pitocin SUCKS.
2007-03-27 16:17:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
wait till the baby is ready or till the doctor tells u they need to induce u
dont be just making that kinda decsion over a silly reason in wanting ur baby to share a bday with ur sister
2007-03-27 16:52:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I really don't think the doctor would agree to this especially for the babies safety. That would be extremely selfish of someone to want the baby born a month early to share a birthday. The baby stays in the body for as long as it needs to so that it can develop correctly. Please don't even ask the doctor to do this.
2007-03-27 16:23:33 · answer #9 · answered by ~LYNZ~ 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
i doubt they would just for that reason even though it is a good one in my book i went in pre-term at 37 weeks 5 days and they stopped me they say 38 weeks is the safest if it has to be early you don't want the baby to come her her sisters b-day and have underdeveloped lungs or something worst i would let the baby decide when to come as long as the Dr agrees be safe and good luck
2007-03-27 16:28:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋