Because more people are waking up to the fact that the official story is untrue.
I first thought 9-11 was an inside job on Sept. 12th, 2001. It seemed awful suspicious to me that they had not an inkling of what was going to happen and yet by the next day knew everything..all the attackers names, flight training history and even what libraries they had used which I don't even know how they would know this as some libraries do not require ID to use Internet nor have cameras..and yet we supposedly knew this.
Then it came out that other countries had warned us and that Bush had warnings.
Few things other than steel survived in big pieces and yet there was a hijacker ID, how convenient and now many of the so called hijackers are coming forward alive and saying they had lost their passports prior to 9-11
Then I heard 5 hours radio show by maker of inplanesite that was most compelling.
Now I have seen loose change and only two days ago watched mysteries911 DVD that was given to me three times with family members. This DVD is most compelling. I was particularly struck by the slant cut steel beams looking like one that were wired as the explosives cut on a slant so the building falls inward and doesn't damage surrounding structures. Slant cut beams with evidence of the use of thermite.
If that many websites are out there, hopefully, the American people will wake up in time, not trust their government leaders, and do something while there is still time. I predict worst lies ahead for us and the world.
2007-03-27 21:44:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by janie 7
·
9⤊
3⤋
Truth: The FBI offers with home disorders, no longer worldwide ones. The seize of Osama bin laden would fall beneath to the CIA, no longer the FBI. Fact: A practically a hundred and twenty story constructing collapsing under its possess weight will sound like an explosion. There was also no proof of explosives found. Reality: The seismic waves created by using the cave in of the dual Towers significantly weakened this structure. There's additionally no proof to help the managed demotion speculation. Fact: No evidence to aid the declare that metal was shipped overseas. Fact: One 120-story building collapsing WILL pulverize concrete. There would also be other potentially hazardous development materials, like asbestos and fiberglass insulation, which definitely had been used within the building of the arena alternate middle towers. Fact: No evidence to help the declare that Bush ordered Cheney to take control of NORAD. Fact: The investigation into the 9-11 assaults performed through the Sep 11 fee used to be a bipartisan and in general accredited document. Extra money does not imply extra accuarte. Truth: To the satisfactory of my potential, you can be correct that nobody has been fired within the wake of the intelligence failures of Sept. 11. Many have resigned from their jobs on account that Sep 11 nonetheless. Truth: There had been daily briefings for years concerning the talents chance that bin encumbered posed to the us. Read the Sep 11 commission's record, you're going to see that this memo is particularly nothing new or surprising. Clinton had the precise same intelligence. Truth: there is quite no proof to aid the declare that Bush orchestrated, carried out, deliberate, or used to be in any way worried with the Sept. 11 attacks. Given that your view is just not the generally held view, the burden of proof to furnish such evidence is most without doubt on your shoulders.
2016-08-10 22:08:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
So many people believe that it was an inside job. The circumstances of how the Bush administration cooperated was dubious at best. I would not trust any of them to sell me a used car much less run this nation. He wanted his war so badly that he would have rationalized anything to get us into it. I don't know about the proof that it is true....but I also am not convinced that it not true. Lets just say that I would not put it past this bunch to pull something like that if it served their purpose.
2007-03-27 15:03:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by kolacat17 5
·
4⤊
2⤋
After looking at both sides of the argument and thoroughly researching the events for well over 2000 hrs, I have conluded that the officail story has no backing. I will even go on and say that it appears that criminal elements within our gov't and MIC likely planned and carried out the attacks. The theory that we only knew and let it happen in not plausible for many reasons, but mostly the controlled demolition of WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7 which was a 47 story building which collapsed at nearly free fall speed. The list goes on forever and I really find out new pieces of info everyday. It is amazing how much info is really out there. All I say is look into the facts and decide for yourself. It is an extremely important issue.
2007-03-27 15:16:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Luke F 3
·
5⤊
4⤋
The same reason there are millions of websites that say evolution is a fraud, global warming doesn't exist, the world is flat, the moon landing is a hoax, or the CIA killed President Kennedy. 9/11 is a historical event which drastically changed United States foreign policy and will undoubtedly shape the future of this nation and the world. This means that there is and always will be a lot of speculation about what actually happened that day.
Personally, I believe that the government's story is 99.9% likely of being what actually happened that day. However, that little bit of doubt is enough to cause a great deal of speculation. Plus, who doesn't like a good story involving government cover-ups, secret plots, and false wars. Tom Clancy and the creators of James Bond have made millions off of this type of plot.
2007-03-27 14:55:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by msi_cord 7
·
5⤊
6⤋
Ask Sandy Burgler why he stole those documents from the National Archives? If there was an "inside" job it was to hide the fact that both the Clinton and Bush administrations didn't take these raghead pricks seriously.
The dems are now on the side of the ragheads, just so they can regain power. The republicans are afraid of the media not liking them so they tie their hands around their balls so the tough decisions on dealing with our enemies go unmade.
The geniuses like Rosie O'Donnell speak for the geniuses who believe those planes flying into the WTC were piloted by Bush. yeah..he hit the ejection seat before they struck the building, and his parachute opening was edited , he really flew all three planes that day, would CNN lie? He then proceeded to seed clouds in the Atlantic to cause hurricane Katrina to attack blacks in New Orleans.
2007-03-27 15:00:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
6⤋
It's an indication of how much distrust the current president has engendered in the American people.
2007-03-27 18:57:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lleh 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Because the current Administration resisted the 911 investigation every step of the way.
If people think the government is hiding something, conspiracy theories abound, as people try to find out what the government is hiding.
In this case, the government was probably just trying to hide their incompetence, not necessarily anything more.
2007-03-27 14:50:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
7⤋
Just because there are millions of websties doesn't mean it's true. Technology is great, but if you believe everything you see on google your just wasting your time......
2007-03-27 14:57:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by rjz17678 1
·
4⤊
3⤋
an estimated 6% of americans still think landing on the moon was a hoax. I guess that means it must be too huh.
2007-03-27 15:04:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by CaptainObvious 7
·
1⤊
5⤋