Either one would be a vast improvement over what we have now.
2007-03-27 13:11:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by tribeca_belle 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton - June 28, 2004, in San Francisco at a Democrat Party fundraiser)
"I want to take those profits and put them into an alternative energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart energy alternatives that will actually begin to move us toward the direction of independence." (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton - February 2, 2007, at DNC Winter Meeting - regarding profits earned by oil companies, which are not [yet] owned by the government)
"As president I know I can't kill, jail or occupy every nation we don't agree with and I cannot just wish that all the terrorists be wiped off the face of the Earth" (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton - February 10, 2007, at a campaign appearance in New Hampshire)
"We're going to change the way we finance the system by taking away money from people who are doing well now" — (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton — March 24, 2007, at a health care forum in Las Vegas)
2007-03-27 13:48:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by mark k 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I didn't know Jesse was running? Who is worse for our country? Man that's a tough one. They are both way to liberal for my taste. Either one would stagnate the economy and blame it on Bush lol I see our country turning more liberal as the years go by with bigger government being a staple with both major parties. All it would do is make us into a 3rd world country a little faster if either one wins. Look for the Islamo fascists to take it as a green light to come over here and raise havoc as soon as we cut and run from Iraq and Afganistan. We live in the most interesting of times!
2007-03-27 14:09:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by crusinthru 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
GWB will already never be and there is no sense to say anybody is better than him. But nobody looks like a communist as much as Hillary. How much she promissed for NY state and what has she done? She is promising fairy tales again for whole country just the same way communists did. I'd better have Obama.
2007-03-27 14:13:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by nasatiani 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Agree with the Clinton comment, the Hussein comment was uncalled for (and I'm a conservative). And Ventura made a horrible Governor what makes you think he could run the entire country?
2007-03-27 13:35:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Cinner 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hilary Clinton.
2007-03-27 14:48:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Whats worse? Voting against someone due to a biased, unbased opinion, or, voting against someone because they share a common name with a mass murder? Ted Kaczynski was the Unabomber. Does this mean that all people with the name Ted are bad people? Such statements as yours are the foundations upon which hatred and racism grow.
2007-03-27 13:54:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mercury 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I just don't understand how anyone with any common sense could possibly think that particular woman who I call Hillbillery or Shrillary, could ever hold the position of the highest office in our beloved United States of America. She's a power hungry beast who only stayed with that scum-sucking lowlife husband because she had her OWN political agenda. As for the other rotten democratic candidate who I will never ever so much as utter his "terror-fying" name if he gets elected, it just boggles my mind that these are the "best" the democrats can come up with??? Maybe some of you liberal democrats don't agree with this war in Iraq, but to me you ought to hold your heads in shame for NOT appreciating our military and the sacrifices they go through for you to have your "FREEDOM" to spit in their faces.
2007-03-27 13:43:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
They have been sending a message to their left wing base to vote for them. It grew to become into purely approximately politics and actual no venture over the risk-free practices of our troops. understand that this bill additionally grew to become into the minimum salary advance as nicely. additionally they voted against that diploma via balloting against the troops. ask your self how which will set in the impending election ?
2016-11-23 20:14:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary Clinton.
Any Republican would be worse for the country though.
2007-03-27 17:25:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Frank 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
They both would be respected as President, Hillary is far more qualified. Jesse would make a good body, I agree with you.
2007-03-27 15:06:08
·
answer #11
·
answered by GO HILLARY 7
·
0⤊
1⤋