English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

"Un-" and "in-" have slightly different usages.

Un- can go with verbs or adjectives, really. However, in- is usually only with adjectives. Besides, in- rolls better with sane than un- does. For example, "ir-'' was put with ''regular'' to make "irregular," just because it flows better.

English has been simplified greatly over hundreds of years, so words have been altered a bit.

Some examples:
-unhappy
-undo
-uneducated
-insignificant
-indirect

2007-03-27 12:45:06 · answer #1 · answered by ♥pirate♥ 4 · 2 0

Un is not necessarily the only prefix that means NOT:

NOT can also mean:
im, in, anti, or un

For example:
immobile: not able to move
inflammable: not able to catch on fire easily
uneducated: not educated
anti-racial: not being judgmental according to race

2007-03-27 13:29:31 · answer #2 · answered by rosie a 2 · 0 0

That would be an inefficient use of letters.
But I need more information to give you an answer.
The information you provided is insufficient.
Why, it's nearly inhuman!

2007-03-27 12:45:19 · answer #3 · answered by Bobby Jim 7 · 2 0

"Un" is one of several negating prefixes; 'in" and "im" are also used. Examples: unsanitary, insincere, impossible.

2007-03-27 12:46:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

For the same reason we drive on parkways and park on driveways.

2007-03-27 12:50:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

or antisane

2007-03-27 12:50:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers