Please Answer
2007-03-27 12:06:07 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Raw won't be better until Vince stops hogging all the TV time.
2007-03-28 10:43:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Now this all depends on what one defines as a "better". From a sports-entertainment perspective, I would have to agree and say that Raw is indeed the better brand. When you have DX, Cena(like him or not he IS the man right now), or celebrity guests just popping up every now and then, you cant help but say spectacle-wise, Raw is better. However, looking at the question from a wrestling content perspective, Smackdown is the show I would pick. If you look at the matches that have been put on, they were phenomenal. From King Booker's reign, to Finlay proving time and time again that he can still go, and Mr. Kennedy himself, the wrestling content of SD! is better than Raw. The fact that Taker and Batista are on SD! helps in bringing in those viewers who watch the SD! for it's flash. Overall, I'm torn between the two I couldn't say. They complement each other in a perfect way that it is so hard to choose.
2007-03-27 19:23:20 · answer #2 · answered by JV 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Raw is better than Smackdown but since i starded watching wrestling to 2006 i Like Smackdown...but smackdonw lost ..John Cena , Rey Mysterio ( he will come back but now he's injured ) , Big Show,and more..Also I think Monday Night Raw is no more entertaining with better storylines. Raw hopefully will continue to be like this and Smackdown needs to improve ... like better superstars and entertaining stuff..matches lke Matt Hardy vs. Mr. Kenndedy just bore the heck out of me...they also need like Hell In A Cell match..even though it's not popular any more and they should make entertaining Falls count anywhere matches..their Falls count anywhere matches SUCK! The superstars dont even really get hit with the steel chairs or anything but in Raw they do and there is blood.
2007-03-27 19:20:45 · answer #3 · answered by Yipen™ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes!Raw is by far better than Smackdown,they both used to be great before the separation of the brands,I still watch both tho,Smackdown does have it's good moments every now and then!!
2007-03-27 19:15:11 · answer #4 · answered by molliehollie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Smackdown is just bad. The Undertaker, Mr. Kennedy and now Kane are the only good talents. But the good news is its on fridays and there are better things to do.
2007-03-27 19:15:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Raw is way better than Smackdown hands down!!!!!!
2007-03-28 13:53:18 · answer #6 · answered by jeweezy2002 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh hell yeah, the WWE shows are basically aired in order of popularity, Raw, ECW, Smackdown, if you notice a bunch of fans at Smachdown and ECW have DX and Cena t shirts which are both Raw
2007-03-27 19:09:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
acutally I liked Smackdown better first, now it just depends on the week. Sometimes Raw is better, sometimes Smackdown is better.
2007-03-27 19:11:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Raw is more exciting to wacth no offense to smackdown but it is kinda boring.
2007-03-31 12:46:02 · answer #9 · answered by charity k 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Smackdown has too much young talent... there is more wrestling. I do not wanna see "cutting edge or Coachman talk. I wanna see MVP vs Kane and Helms vs Chavo
2007-03-27 19:15:43 · answer #10 · answered by All Hope is Gone 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋