2007-03-27 11:59:47 · 7 answers · asked by craig s 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
That's already provided for. Check out article one, section two of the Constitution
2007-03-27 14:25:07 · answer #1 · answered by gunplumber_462 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The house of representitives needs to be replaced with people who understand the concept of representing the people that voted them in, rather than being a popular sound bite artist. Term limits of 2 terms would so greatly improve what gets done in Washington. If they knew their time was limited, more work would get done and you would feel as though you were properly represented.
2007-03-27 13:32:50 · answer #2 · answered by Papa Joe 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In my experience, the amount of work done by a committee is inversely proportional to the size of the committee. If there were more members of Congress they would get less done. Come to think of it, that's not such a bad idea!
2007-03-27 12:05:15 · answer #3 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh, maybe we should have two or three presidents too, what do ya think about 2 or 3 Bushs?
2007-03-27 14:37:26 · answer #4 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You want more overpaid crooks in washington?
2007-03-27 12:24:47 · answer #5 · answered by mike Z 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, definetely not. We have too many idiots in there allready.
2007-04-01 07:36:51 · answer #6 · answered by Robert T 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, that is irrelevant.
2007-04-03 09:32:49 · answer #7 · answered by ha_mer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋