English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Some of the Iraqi people asked for our help and if we pull out we will be turning our backs on them. Just like Vet.

2007-03-27 11:39:13 · 35 answers · asked by DONALD G 1 in Politics & Government Politics

35 answers

They already see us as the Paper Tiger that we are. The very vocal minority in this country screams cowardice to the rest of the world every day. And they laugh at us from their caves plotting the end to our nation knowing that half the people wouldn't even fight if they were invaded. Pulling out of Iraq will only strengthen that opinion.

2007-03-27 11:48:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

Let's be clear. No Iraqi's asked for American help. America betrayed them in 1991. After bombing them into the stone age. Then slapped 12 tears of harsh punitive sanctions on the civilians. A few cautious hopefuls prayed Bush Jr.'s rhetoric was sincere and were disillusioned quickly. If we leave they will reconcile. Now that the big 4 oil co.'s have secured the drilling rights 4 next 30 years tears, Bush added a provision to withdrawal. You may have missed it as media fixated on Anna Nicole, then Gonzales's. If you want occupiers out give your oil to the big 4 Exxon Mobile, Chevron and 2 other. and split the profits among all.Kurd, Sunni and Shia. For this they will have 2 give away all their only resource and receive a mere Patience of 6 to 8 % of profits. So this "BENCHMARK" is merely establishing ownership.
As I said before despite Saddam's brutality , the oil was nationalized and even with his extravagances Palaces etc, (as if CEO's here never abuse public money. withthis revenue he built up a modern infw structure,hospitals,schools,Univeities, highways and the lights were on, The oil co.'s using puplic taxes are in the mist of building Middle East Head Quaters. Staet cost $10Billion. This will be bigger than Vatican city and some small States. It will staff 8,000, be completely self sustained as in air, water,electity. Have it's own Police force. maintenance crews an technigitions. It boasts being harded enough to with stand a nuclear Blast.This tadgiclly leaves Iraq in a LOSE// Situation.Give their oil away and occupiers will leave,minus contractors and Security to fnish H.Q.
This the condition for Iaq's . Hand over all property rights to massive oil reserves, and The GREAT Satan wil gather up troops d evacuatan If they will notcomply. Troops stay dearh an Gaos reughn
Almoest all oil pruding countries keep their oil nationa;ized to build a dreat society Thi mens $$ 4 chool, hospitals Universeties eg;They beieve oil is natualtrasre to share for all citxens...For a great nation to become the masses need to be educated, Heahy and have hope in their futures.....thak god w learned eary of thi sevil system (souds lke socisliim) our way is best give all e resources of the 'and to a few cooks at the top' as in Bush/Cheny/ Rockerfeller atc, As the wealthy get o weathy as to be above the lawSo the top 2%of naton own almost everying and most of planet live then on less hen a dollara day. I despise these greed/power wars...and that is what they are...Mar.

2007-04-03 23:56:48 · answer #2 · answered by mary57whalen 5 · 1 0

First, I must tell you that invading an independent state is against sovereignty. However, humanitarian intervention is acceptable in international law. I believe, to a greater extent, that is what America did. Saddam Hussein is no more and there is some level of democracy now. America should pull out. If not, then they are there for a hidden agenda. Something we don't want to think of America. Let America do as Nelson Mandela. He fought against apartheid and was imprisoned for 27 years. When he was released, he was elected president. But he never clinged to that seat. In Africa we say " A cola nut that stays longer in the mouth becomes sour"
America should pull out. There are may ways to help Iraq without keeping the troops there.

2007-04-03 20:14:57 · answer #3 · answered by Political man 2 · 2 0

Pulling out of Iraq is not the issue. As long as Iraq has oil and we have SUVs, we will have a presence there. Should we keep a large military presence is the real question.

Who are we protecting and from what? Clearly, there is chaos and folks are blowing up things left and right, but unless we plan to "run" the country we don't really have a role. It seems that our biggest fear is who will have the biggest influence on the future of Iraq - whether its Iran or the more moderate neighbors. If this is really the concern, we should be beefing up the moderate neighbors instead of sending in our brave sons and daughters as target practice.

2007-04-04 09:12:26 · answer #4 · answered by therainbowseeker 4 · 0 0

look bottom line is we have lost respect. even our last elections were laughed at. we said they had wmd with our intelligence we lied. we said mission accomplished well over 3000 and still growing sacrifices we realized oh wait mission not done. we said we will find saddam and we did and we said we will get rid of him and we did. but the 2 reasons were wmds which we never ever will find and toppling saddam which is done. ok so what is the truth? what is the hidden agenda? why are we still losing our young brave men? why are we being called you dont support our troops if you want them to come home? ask how many of these people in politics kids are over there and why not if they are not after all this war is for their goals. god bless america and every1 else.

2007-04-04 05:21:39 · answer #5 · answered by Tony M 3 · 1 0

The Iraqi people never asked for our help!
A couple of Quislings like Chalabi did what Cheyney paid them to do.
Almost the entire Christian population of Iraq has been made homeless by our occupation. That's hundreds of thousands of Christians.

I'm a Vietnam Vet I don't feel bad about Vietnam or my sevice.

Grow Up

2007-04-02 13:36:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

It doesn't matter if the US stays or pulls out. EVERYTHING the US does is wrong in their view. The US needs to worry about doing what's best for America, period. People like to call the US an "empire", but it seem they have no idea how a real empire operates. Well, maybe is time to get them what they want and start acting like one ( Egypt, Persia, Rome, even France will be some good examples to follow ).

2007-03-31 13:25:24 · answer #7 · answered by SP 2 · 2 2

HOPEFULLY, that they shouldnt mess with us, since we have a real cowboy at the healm & he would invade them at the drop of a hat. If they have a major oil reserve watch it or we'll come to "liberate" them(from the oil). Like your question states, the importance will be if we HELP them after we leave, or do we turn our backs. which we wouldnt, too much money to be made there...

2007-04-04 09:41:18 · answer #8 · answered by intimadatein 3 · 0 0

They will think exaclty what they thought from the start: we had no right nor reason to be thee in the first place without widespread world wide support
Its exaclty like vietnam and the president refuses to see it

2007-04-04 09:26:18 · answer #9 · answered by eddie9551 5 · 0 0

pull out and squirt on it not in it,,,,, my dad always said a mans home is his castle,,we went to there house and started trouble,,,this is a no no that broken down army was like wipin an old women but thats the easy part,,they will think we are gutless lymees

2007-04-03 21:57:29 · answer #10 · answered by EAGLE_ 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers