English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If we paid 1/2 of what we paid for bombs towards getting food water and services to the millions that need it, not only would we be helping those that need it, we would also be contesting the negative ideas and ideology of extremists. Had we stuck with small special ops along Afghan boarder and not moved into Iraq so quickly and ill prepared, we would have caught "the people that knocked those buildings down". Had we diverted the financial and personnel resources to supporting humanitarian relief around the globe, we would have undermined the extremists’ message. Iraq and other campaigns these days are all about gaining control and power when they should be controlled ways to empower the indigenous people; improving their life instead of disabling and validating the extremists’ campaign. Typically, people that need the help the most are those that don’t know or understand what is going on elsewhere – but they do know things where they are could be better.

2007-03-27 11:14:34 · 10 answers · asked by Gerard O 1 in Politics & Government Government

10 answers

If we did then what would they spend there money on? I know weapons. Example North Korea... Most of his country is starving but he is busy firing his missles into the Japanese ocean testing them so he can blow up the west coast.

2007-03-27 11:42:28 · answer #1 · answered by Nixed 1 · 0 0

The United States gives more money tword humanitarian relief then all other countries combined. And all we get back is how evil we are. It's the governments responsibilites to distribute fairly what we give and most don't. I wished we'd just stay home mind our own business and next time someone needs something call on France or Iran.......

2007-03-27 12:12:25 · answer #2 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0 0

hi

2007-03-27 11:17:26 · answer #3 · answered by produde12 2 · 0 0

Nice in theory but not a reality..

If you read the world opinion poll you will be surprised that the country with the highest percentage anti-american beliefs is actually............. Australia....

2007-03-27 11:27:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. Despite liberal ideological rants, terror is NOT caused by poverty. If it were, there would be terrorists from Ethiopia instead of Saudi Arabia.

2007-03-27 12:08:26 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0 0

example...we have been providing aide to africa for how many decades?...look how far thats got us.
FIX AMERICA FIRST!
the world is full of alot of beautiful things and its full of alot of shitty things...simple balance

2007-03-27 11:22:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i suggest you do a little research on the enemy , you obviously have no idea who we are fighting

2007-03-27 11:22:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If only it were as simple as you say. But it's not.

2007-03-27 11:30:32 · answer #8 · answered by Delray 3 · 0 0

Basically you mean bribery?

No.

2007-03-27 11:17:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

NO.

2007-03-27 11:23:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers