Rather than a 'War on Terrorism'. I've checked the Geneva Convention and it affords all soldiers under a Declaration of War (Something George W. said himself!) the same basic human rights.
And for those who say "Well the terrorists don't play by the rules so why should we?" Think! If we lower ourselves to their standards then what are we fighting for?
2007-03-27 11:12:18 · 10 answers · asked by Taliesin Pen Beirdd 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I thank all for their input, and no I don't support terrorism, I support truth. If George W. wants a war then he should adhere to the Geneva Convention, if he wants to make his own rules, he shouldn't call it a WAR!
2007-03-27 11:44:18 · update #1
He should have called "global terrorist campaign against middle east oil companies".
ter·ror·ism (těr'ə-rĭz'əm) Pronunciation Key
n. The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
The u.s gov uses terrorism too.
Take care.
2007-03-27 11:17:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
George W. Bush should have called what he's doing a Global Terrorism Campaign.
2007-03-27 11:20:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
maximum have been repeated yet sick upload one. a million. of course we've not been attacked for the reason that 9/11 2. saddam and his regime have been removed from capability. 3. the iraqi's are becoming extra powerfuble than maximum human beings be attentive to or choose for to comprehend. in modern-day assaults from terrorists IN iraq, american troops did fairly no longer something at the same time as an iraqi military grow to be mobilized to handle the subject. i think that ought to fall decrease than the definition of progression thinking the place they began. Dont continually purchase into the "everyday" opinion nonsense that maximum of seem difficulty to.
2016-10-20 02:08:53 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He definitely should have, mainly under reasons of gaining support. When people hear "Global Campaign Against Terrorism," they automatically associate it with bringing about justice and freeing the world of evil... However, when people hear "War in Iraq," the associations are less positive.
2007-03-27 11:17:40 · answer #4 · answered by Dale Kaminski 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's not even really a war on terrorism , so it doesn't matter what it's called. It's America trying to force democracy on a country that doesn't want it, hence the suicide bombing s and attacks on our soldiers, they want us out!
....after all, the "terrorists" that started the scare in the first place were Afghani....
2007-03-27 11:20:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The war in Iraq only promotes terrorism.
2007-03-27 11:15:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely not. "Global Campaign" in his dreams.
2007-03-27 11:16:32 · answer #7 · answered by Meowzer 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it's difficult to win a war using peace when the enemy is using death . think!
2007-03-27 11:18:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
So... you support terrorism?
2007-03-27 11:15:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I am not really sure after watching this video:
:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=cxwodratsxa&m...
http://youtube.com/watch?v=02pwvfihcgk&m...
2007-03-27 11:15:56 · answer #10 · answered by Goldman I 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋