Regardless of their Collective IQs, if averaged, can a group test and reveal any IQ higher than their average?

Question

The Testing for IQ, is Controversial-the tests of the person Credited with the highest Known IQ, is also controversial and yields many different #s. The joke is, "How can an idiot measure the IQ of a genius?" I postulate that smart people know they are smart, why wouldn't they (?), but stupid people don't know they are stupid, how could they(?). Which is the greater tool and of the most value, a high IQ or being aware to the point of precognition. Is the precognition a product of a high IQ, or a high IQ the result of precognition, or just really quick synaptic junctions? If a person exceeds the tester's ability to evaluate, than are they smarter or have a higher IQ than the highest measured (by the ability to measure). And at what point does Collective Academician Ego enter into the equation and simply, 'draw a line in the sand' and say, "Your property line begins here on your oceanfront house, because that is where the high tide mark is."? Animals are smarter than us, environmentally.

Answer 1

Personally, i believe everything you were implying is sensible and factual. An IQ does nto really determine genius, since there are many types of intelligence. There are those who are academic achievers (who mostly do well on IQ test,) then there are those who are atlethic achievers and those who are street smart.
I think the IQ test were invented as a way of proving a point that cannot be validated, that there are those who are actually smarter than others. Personally your IQ can be determined by interest, and what you have learned since i do not think there is a way to measure cognitive abilities.
I personally think both intelligence (not only refering to high IQ) and precognition are important for survival in reality.