English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

I would say yes because if you don't give a complete employment history they may ask why you covered up, also you would need to explain gaps in your employment history. Every job requires different skills and even if you left because you didn't like the job you can explain why you left and what you have learned from the experience.

2007-03-27 10:30:40 · answer #1 · answered by Jez 5 · 0 0

My suggestion is create 2 separate experience sections with one being "relevant experience" and the other being "other experience". Jobs that RELATE to the position you're applying for (not nessarily having the same job titles, but also if they require similar skills) should go in the "relevant experience" section. Jobs that don't relate to the position you're applying for should go in the "other experience" section. If you have enough relevant experience to take up most of the space in your resume (making sure to include the duties and accomplishments of the jobs), then when you get to the "other experience" section, merely list the job title, company, and dates. This way less emphasis is placed on it and employers are less likely to look @ it if you don't provide any information such as job duties, etc.

2007-03-27 18:08:51 · answer #2 · answered by shanna 4 · 0 0

Yes unless the job was 7 years or more ago, then you can leave it off

2007-03-27 20:09:35 · answer #3 · answered by cammie 4 · 0 0

ya i think it's good to do that, even if it's a short period, if you attended a seminar you can include it, a training course, etc...
working for a short period is also an experience, so I recommend that you should include it and the length of time you worked there, good luck

2007-03-27 17:46:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers