No crime has been committed!
2007-03-27 10:45:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Come on! You cannot legally impeach a president unless he has broken the law. The war on terror was funded by congress. They cannot, now that they have changed their jello-like minds, impeach a president because they think the war was a mistake.
Talking about it does get the anti-war vote for the Democrats though!
2007-03-27 17:46:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Mysterious Stranger 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well, he has also committed high crimes and misdemeanors, including illegally spying on Americans without the use of proper authority, he has secret CIA torture camps all over the world, which violates international law.
I would have said no until recently, but his stance in Iraq leading to 4 years of failure, that he thinks there is only one branch of government, and he can unilaterally violate the constitution at whim is concerning!
The reason I would impeach him is that he is an idiot dumb enough to attack Iran, and I believe he is looking for excuses to do that, just like he did in Iraq, which all turned out to be lies!
Given that most of our military is already tied up in Iraq as the US spends more for missiles than on the people who fight the wars! Missiles tend to get scrapped and it is pissing money down a drain, Bush's option in Iran will be the use of tactical nuclear devices, which I do not want to happen!
Bush needs to go as I have no doubt that Bush will attack Iran before he is out of office, though warned by the Senate numerous times not to do that!
The Republicans are the first calling for his impeachment!
Sra, how are you blaming Iraq on Carter? Iraqis have always suspected that the 1963 military coup that set Saddam Husain on the road to absolute power had been masterminded by the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). New evidence just published reveals that the agency not only engineered the putsch but also supplied the list of people to be eliminated once power was secured--a monstrous stratagem that led to the decimation of Iraq's professional class.
The overthrow of president Abdul Karim Kassim on February 8, 1963 was not, of course, the first intervention in the region by the agency, but it was the bloodiest--far bloodier than the coup it orchestrated in 1953 to restore the shah of Iran to power. Just how gory, and how deep the CIA's involvement in it, is demonstrated in a new book by Said Aburish, a writer on Arab political affairs. Source: Kryss Katsiavriades and Talaat Qureshi,
The Acts of the Democracies: 1960 to 1964
I don't think Carter was President in 1963 when we put Saddam in power!
2007-03-27 17:26:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
The more you and all those other Bush haters bring up impeachment, the sillier it makes you sound. It's getting repetitive. Try something new for a change. Because you are kicking a dead horse with this one.
2007-03-27 17:13:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
No, impeaching Pres. Bush will only make thing worse!
2007-03-27 17:17:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by holyfire 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
You're not serious, right?
"We" don't JUST impeach a President. It's a long, arduous, expensive, emotionally draining process that most of America does not want to go through again. Thank you very much.
You must have been under your rock when most of America voted to make him their leader and when most of the democratically elected Congress voted to allow him a free hand in the "War on Terror" and when they then voted again and again to fund that war, etc, etc, etc........
2007-03-27 17:21:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by CJohn317 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
For the 1,000,000th time:
No impeachable offences have been committed.
Pls pass on to the rest of the Democrats out there. Talk about dumb and dumber, the more they say impeachment, the dumber they sound.
2007-03-27 17:18:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by chefantwon 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
Impeachment implies laws broken.
Good luck with that, ok?
2007-03-27 17:25:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by MoltarRocks 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
NO!! No WAR is ever popular we were called WAR MONGERS by the NAZI'S too. How many 9/11 type attacks have happened since?How many would be acceptable to you.Why don't you move your sorry a_ _ to Iraq and make a difference.
2007-03-27 17:19:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by redwingnut16 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
I would like to. Too bad the next in line is actually worse than what's in now. That's incentive for keeping the Shrub around.
2007-03-27 17:15:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Garth Rocket 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
What mess would that be....
...the strongest, most profitable economy in the history of the world?
....the lowest unemployment rate in US history?
...maybe you mean the lowest interest rates in 35 years?
You're right!!! I guess he's a failure.
Stay in school, kid....maybe you'll learn how the world really works.
2007-03-27 17:18:55
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋