To me this is an either or situation.
In my opinion, even if the entire population of the United States voted we still would end up with the same results.
The power of the people, is supposedly provided by voting people into office.
Once those people are in office (as they are now) it's up to them to lead and guide our country on behalf of us citizens. If it's not happening now, why would going through the same process have any different results?
What crushes our government? Votes? No way!
No votes? Very doubtful.
Boycott? But how?
If everyone in America boycotted taxes - that would hit them very hard.
Oh yeah, the government would just withhold money from our paychecks, right?
Well, they would to a point, but if everyone stopped filing taxes and ceased relying so much on government; that would sure grab their attention.
The government is odds on favorite to pass any law, any restriction and any limit on anything they see fit - since they have us in a lose-lose situation by being at work while they go about voting for or mandating anything they need - knowing that we can't just leave our jobs to become their watchdogs on how they handle themselves as they pass one Bill after another.
I've personally attended a countless number of City meetings where there was a Mayor and four City Council members.
In order to speak at any such gathering, one had to fill out a little card with your name and topic on which you wanted to speak to them about.
That's all fine and dandy, but there's a good sized sign before entering the meeting chamber that states no one can argue or debate with the Mayor or any Council members.
Then why the hell go?
They don't address mail, email or any other form of correspondence, so how much more infective can a City (or government) be?
Yeah, my take is to cut their spending by not giving them our money to play with.
Nuts huh? lol
2007-03-27 17:26:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Rothschild Influence
When America was founded, the Rothschilds were very unhappy because it was founded on the (Christian) Common Law. The Common Law is based on substance, and this substance is mentioned in the Constitution as gold or silver. America is a Constitutional Republic, a union of the States under the Constitution. When Congress was working for the Republic, the only thing it could borrow was gold or silver, and the Rothschild banks did not lend gold or silver. Naturally, they did not like this new government. The Rothschilds had a deal with the King of England. He would borrow paper and agree to repay in gold. But these United States, with their Constitution, were an obstacle to them, and it was much to the Rothschild's advantage to get the colonies back under the King. So the Rothschilds financed the War of 1812 to bring America back under England. Of course, it didn't work, so they had to find another way.
The Flaw In the Constitution, Two Nations in One
It was around the time of the American Civil War that they discovered a flaw in the Constitution. The flaw was Article I, Section 8, Clause 17. Remember ' that there are two nations called "United States." What is a nation? If you would agree with this definition: Whenever you have a governing body, having a prescribed territory containing a body of people. Is that a nation? Yes. We have a governing body in the Republic, "the three branches of government." There are the legislative, the executive, and the judicial branches. There is a prescribed territory containing a body of. people. This is a Constitutional Republic.
But Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 gave Congress, which is the legislative branch of the three branches government, exclusive rule over a given territory known as the District of Columbia, containing a body of people. Here we have a nation within a nation. This is a legislative democracy within a Constitutional Republic.
When Congress was a part of the Constitutional Republic, it had the obligation of providing a medium of exchange for us. Its duty was to coin gold or silver. Anyone who had a piece of gold or silver could bring it in and have it freely minted into coin. This was the medium of exchange for the Republic. But, in the Legislative Democracy (over Washington D.C.), Congress is not limited by the Constitution. Congress has exclusive rule over the District of Columbia. The legislators can make the law by a majority vote, and that makes it a democracy; they have the authority to have administrative agents to enforce their own law; and they have courts in the legislative branch of government, to try their own law. Here we have the legislature making the law, enforcing the law and trying the law, all within the one branch of government. This is a one-branch government within a three branch government.
Under the three-branch government, Congress passes law which has to be in harmony with the Constitution. The executive enforces the law passed by the Congress, and the judiciary tries the law, pursuant to the Constitution.
The Three-branch Constitutional Republic, and the One-branch legislative democracy are both called the United States. One is the federal United States, and the other is the continental United States.
Are You a United States Citizen?
If you say that you are a United States citizen, which United States are you referring to?
Anyone who lives in the District of Columbia is a United States citizen. The remaining population in the fifty states is the national citizenry of the nation. We are domiciled in various sovereign states, protected by the constitutions of those states from a direct rule of Congress over us. In the democracy, anyone who lives in those states known as Washington D.C., Guam, Puerto Rico, or any of the other federally held territories is a citizen of the United States (D.C.).
We must be careful with our choice of words: we are not citizens of the United States. We are not subject to Congress. Congress has exclusive rule over a given territory, and we are not part of that territory. Where did Congress get the authority to write the Internal Revenue Code? It is found in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution. To pass that law, they only needed a majority vote. There is no other way that they could p *** laws directly affecting individuals. Title 26, the Internal Revenue code, was passed as law for another nation (remember our definition of 'nation'), but Tide 26 is not consistent with the Bill of Rights. If you try to fight the IRS, you have no rights-the Code does not allow you any of your constitutional rights. It simply says, "You failed to file an income tax form. You failed to perform in some specific manner."
Remember, under the Common Law, you are free to do whatever you want, as long as you do not infringe upon the life, liberty, or property of anyone else. If you do not want to Perform, you don't have to. The only way you can be compelled to perform under the Constitution in the continental United States, is when you have entered a contract and have failed and fulfill our obligations. But if you are not under a contract you can not be compelled to perform. How can you be compelled to file an income tax form, or any form? You can't!
When Congress works for the Republic, every law it passes must be in harmony with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, but when Congress works for the Legislative Democracy, any law it passes becomes the law of the land (remember, Congress has exclusive legislative control over federal territory). If you are charged with willful failure to file an income tax 1040 form, that is a law for a different nation. You are a nonresident alien to that nation. It is a foreign corporation to you. It is not the Republic of the continental United States coming after you, it is a foreign nation, a legislative democracy of a foreign nation coming after you.
If you get a Notice of Deficiency from the IRS, it is a presentment from the federal United States, and then you can use the UCC to dishonor it, and you can also mention that you are among the national citizen of continental United States, and you are a nonresident alien to the federal United States. You never lived in a federal territory and never had any income from the federal United States. Furthermore, you cannot be required to file or pay taxes under the compelled benefit of using the Federal Reserve Notes, because you have reserved your rights under the Common Law through the Uniform Commercial Code at 1-207.
2007-03-29 16:57:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋