Once again the terrorists have targeted a place where innocent civilians, frequently with children, congregate to perform tasks integral to their daily lives. Yet I never see anyone one against the war critical of the terrorists or their tactics. Why is that?
2007-03-27 09:22:30 · 16 answers · asked by meathookcook 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because the LIBS think that anyone labelled "terrorist" or "insurgent" is automatically a "freedom fighter," struggling against the oppression of the capitalist masters, a sort of Robin Hood who will free the masses from the chains of capitalism and let their young hungry hearts burn with true unencumbered FREEDOM!
and somehow, they ignore the burqas on women, no education for girls, and using children inside car bombs.
because there is nothing so blind as a LIB staring straight into the facts.
2007-03-27 09:36:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Liberals are disgusted by it. But we are realists enough to know that it wouldn't be happening if Bush didn't invade Iraq. Those innocent people would still be alive. The Bush surrenderees have yet to learn this fact and catch up to the rest of America who support getting out of Iraq. BTW, I'd like to know what the Bush administration is doing about the Women who are having to dress in Burkas or the school teachers who are being targeted. NOTHING, that's what. Yet, these Bush idiots want to blame the liberals, un-fvcking believable.
2007-03-27 10:01:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It isn't a civil war, at least the Iraqis do not think it is a civil war.
The Democrats in the United States only care about their own freedoms, the do not support Democracy for the people of Iraq.
They are hypocrites in the biggest way.
2007-03-27 09:32:56 · answer #3 · answered by Dina W 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
question: Do Muslims have a issue with strapping bombs to their little ones and then fleeing the scene in the previous they blow them up? "There are none who're righteous, no no longer one... For all have sinned and fallen in need of the attention of God." might your heart be loosed from the evil one that seeks to eat you. might the God of our salvation proceed to knock on the doors of your heart which you will possibly be able to sooner or later have ears to take heed to and enable Him in. Jesus is better than a prophet between prophets. he's your Messiah in whom you will locate the promise of eternal existence. seek for Him at the same time as He could be discovered! ~Selah
2016-10-20 01:59:58 · answer #4 · answered by balikos 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe its a civil war. There is nothing civil about it except it kills mostly Civilians.
2007-03-27 09:44:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that we are disgusted that children are over there dying. Both when their countrymen kill them and when we accidently drop bombs on their village.
This goes both ways. If we are critical of the terrorist tactics, we must be critical of our own, because we are killing people too, and we aren't fighting for some delusional idea of independence.
2007-03-27 09:32:35 · answer #6 · answered by Ice 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Maybe because if we hadn't gone to war, these secular attacks would have been stopped by Saddam Hussein?
Meanwhile we're tripling the murder rate in Iraq just trying to keep things under control.. poorly.
2007-03-27 09:29:10 · answer #7 · answered by Zenrage 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hey guy, that's part of there being a civil war. the very fact it happened shows we're not stopping the problem so why not get OUR people out of the middle of their internal problem.
2007-03-27 09:29:12 · answer #8 · answered by Alan S 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because that doesn't fall in line with the "Hate Bush" plans.
2007-03-27 09:30:43 · answer #9 · answered by Amer-I-Can 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because that would make the liberal's view of the Iraq war look wrong...we know liberals aren't wrong. Only the American tactics are wrong...at least, that's what they keep telling us.
2007-03-27 09:29:00 · answer #10 · answered by arwenlotr2 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋