no he's not. but he would probably be considered a mass murderer. serial killer follow different rules kinda than what he has done.
2007-03-27 08:43:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by eawolfpack04 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
That is a heated topic.
In my mind, Bush's decision has cost LOTS of lives. So if you want to say that he is a serial killer, that is your choice. However, the jury is still out on if the number of lives he cost, is more or less than the number that would have died if it weren't for his decision. That is almost impossible to ever know.
Let's not forget that Bill Clinton also bombed Iraq. Hillary felt he was a GRAVE danger to the world before the Iraq war. It was almost unanomous that we should get rid of Saddam ASAP at the time.
Why rewrite history and blame everything on GWB? He has some fault, but not all of it. Has he made mistakes, yes, but we will never know if the world is safer because of his decisions or more dangerous. People, media, government can only make guesses... often based on biases.
We are looking at this situation while it is going on. We wont have the clear picture for another 15 years... then the truth of our time will come out and the perspectives will be more clear by looking at it 100 miles above. There will be no reason to make politically bias claims at that point. We will see how Iraq is, and we will evaluate for ourselves if it was a good idea to dethrone Saddam, or it was a bad idea.
2007-03-27 08:54:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by michmounty 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know if serial killer is right term to use ,but I can't help but wonder what really separates President Bush from Saddam Hussein. In fact our country is mired in so much cover up while we are pointing our finger's at the other person telling them how they should do thing's. Take a look at 35 years ago when our very country was dropping Agent Orange on our troop's in Vietnam and the death's caused from this and our country is still denying the cancer and death's were caused by this Agent Orange. Now take a look at the very cover up going on today,where our military lied and covered up the true fact's of former football player Pat Tillman. Yet we say Saddam was wrong and we are right,but we aren't right. In my eyes President Bush is responsible for over 3,000 death's of our troops in Iraq,but may you get a good night's rest tonight Mister President.
2007-03-27 09:03:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by michael a 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
In what respect?? Granted the "war" should have been over a long time ago. But the fact that they would follow our men and women back. Would you want a terrorist to blow up your workplace or your house, because they came back this way?
Our men and women may be dying, but they are keeping us safe. Look at it this way, we may have unfortunately lost 3,000 lives, but in Vietnam, the total was 58,000.
I think we are better off now, we are pulling out in the next year (hopefully) and Bush won't be in office much longer, and you can put someone you believe will handle things better.
It's all a matter of opinion. I think that he's gotten in to deep and he doesn't know what he's doing anymore...but to call him a serial killer...is a lil extreme.
2007-03-27 08:55:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by ksgrl_86 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
No....Not really...Exept for the fact that a serial killer is a lot nicer than Bush is...
2007-03-27 08:46:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Miami Rox 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
serial killers know their victims and are up close and personal when they die. To GWB the fine young Americans that die are just numbers on a page.
So yes there is a difference, GWB is way colder.
2007-03-27 08:45:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Alan S 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Serial killers are smarter.
2007-03-27 08:44:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Valkanas 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, most serial killers are actually intelligent.
2007-03-27 08:43:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
If you want to call President Kennedy,President Johnson or any other President that sent someone off to war than I guess we should classify them all as Killers along with all of the congressmen and women and senators that went along with it.The Million who died in WWI the million that died in WWII the thousands that Died in Korea the 58000 that died in Vietnam and the 70000 that committed suicide after Vietnam,then they are all KILLERS.
2007-03-27 08:49:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I strongly have faith that each and one and all international leaders would desire to be atheists, or a minimum of shop their non secular ideals to themselves and out of government subject concerns. between that, i've got faith that absolute power DOES corrupt actual. that's particularly confusing for me to understand what those all and sundry is thinking whilst they homicide, and danger all and sundry elses lives yet their own. what's it that makes their recommendations so diverse than variety, rational thinking human beings? the place is the humanity in them? you're desirable in suggesting that power hungry parasites have a similar makeup as a serial killer. the element that maximum of those human beings had in basic grew to become into that their dying could benefit the few. Take 9/eleven case in point. It makes me vomit with i think of approximately each and all of the money, and power Bush and friends made off this deal. look how paranoid they are attempting to make us with years of "terrorism probability point orange" and crap. I knew it grew to become into all bull. It grew to become into an interior job, like the 1st bombing years till now that grew to become into. American are actual fooled via the mainstream media..."they could by no skill try this to us...it may be on the information" that's what I hear as quickly as I communicate out. they want us to provide up our freedom for fake risk-free practices. What we want is risk-free practices from them. All of those politicians would desire to be wiped out, and we as individuals would desire to return jointly to plot a clean gadget.
2016-11-23 19:46:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋