English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What kind of year do you think McNabb will have in 07? I have him in fantasy football and I need to pick my keeper for next year by April 1st. I need to choose between McNabb or Brady. Our league is TD heavy, so I need to try and predict which one will get more TDs next year.

2007-03-27 08:23:42 · 13 answers · asked by mrcphstitans 2 in Sports Football (American)

13 answers

Brady no doubt.

2007-03-27 08:27:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

This one should be a no brainer... BRADY!!. McNabb can't stay off the injured reserve list, whereas Brady start 16 games a year, has a deep threat to throw to now in Stallworth and is just all around bette than McNabb. You would be dumb to keep McNabb over Brady.

2007-03-27 09:31:13 · answer #2 · answered by DoReidos 7 · 1 0

No question Tom Brady. New England has really stocked up their receivers. Plus McNabb may not even be able to start the season because of his knee injury, and I don't expect the Eagle to gamble rushing him back too early since the worked out so well with the Dolphins and Daunte Culpepper.

2007-03-27 08:37:24 · answer #3 · answered by Aubie 4 · 1 0

McNabb or Brady? McNabb as you may know is injury prone. Brady is the person to go with. As long as he keeps healthy your good. I am an Eagles fan trust me when you need McNabb the most he will let you down.

2007-03-28 00:17:54 · answer #4 · answered by kepples 1 · 0 0

Are you KIDDING? PICK TOM BRADY. The Pats just signed Donte Stallworth a great deep threat, Kelly Washington a HUGE slot reciver, and Wes Welker a great middle reciver. McNabb just lost Stallworth. Who the heak does he have to throw TDs to??!!! The Pats have a REAL GOOD reciving corps now.

Tom Brady is OF COURSE the best choice of the two.

2007-03-27 10:06:32 · answer #5 · answered by J.A. 4 · 0 0

i could pass with Brady even nonetheless SD has a extra physically powerful protection for some motives. one million. San Diego's secondary is distinctly undesirable. they are held jointly via their line of defense and line backers. 2. Washington's protection is underrated, particularly their secondary. 3. McNabb does not pass in the pocket like he used to that's a huge area of his interest. 4. Brady has great time receivers. 5. McNabb has Kevin Curtis.

2016-11-23 19:43:59 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Brady hasn't missed a game in how long... Compared to McNabb who hasn't played a full season in how long.... Depending on what other qb's are out there and what draft pick you have I say go with Brady.

2007-03-27 08:27:17 · answer #7 · answered by m_torres10 3 · 1 0

wassup with all these white boyz picking brady....is he ur hero guyz???.... Mcnabb is the obviouse choice...he had Todd Pinkston and James Thrash...and was a top quaterback...now he has Reggie Brown and Hank Baskett... 2 gr8 young Recievers....and Brian Westbrook and Donovan Mcnabb equals lethal anyday...and mojority of defenses will pay attention 2 Westbrook....Don can pik apart the defenses... if u pik Brady...u will have many interceptions...dnt think the defense the Pats have isnt a factor on the quarter back.... his mood will determine his average....and he has no running game....Don ovr Brady anyday

2007-03-27 14:43:08 · answer #8 · answered by BadAndy 1 · 0 0

If you conside the toughness of both QB's on top of the wide receivers the Pats have picked up this offseason, I think you have to pick Brady.

2007-03-27 08:34:15 · answer #9 · answered by followthefisher 3 · 0 0

i would go with Brady he just got a new core of receivers and he preforms year in and year out. he might even win the Superbowl, the patriots are beefed for next year that's why i think they'll win. good luck

2007-03-27 08:36:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers