After so many years of succes and money where she had been earning 1 million dollars per friends episode, don´t you think is really repugnant have to go to the clasic and stupid "lesbian kiss" for gaining audience...
Don´t you think that at her age she should be less materialistic and more able to come with something more interesting, less cheesy, repeated, silly commertial and repugnantly obvious than a lesbian kiss with her best friend...?
The are already famous, already rich, don´t you think is time for them to use this oportunities to make something..else..i don´t pretend them to be DEEEEP, but, my God, so cheap...?
2007-03-27 08:00:27 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Is courious how people with a hair style, house all over California, acces to the best thing in life are able to get down so badly for rating and money... I agree with you totally, they could look for a good script, for a nice concept, now they know the people, they have the image, they have the fame, the age and the experience and then...they come whit this... really cheap, cheap and cheap...unwise and unproffesional.
Maybe that is why everybody leave Jennifer, maybe she is not that mature nice altruist person...
And no...we don´t leave the celebrities alone... at least we should choose who has the right to become one.
I AM NOT A CELEBRITY AND STILL I HAVE TO TAKE A LOT OF CARE OF WHAT I DO ANYWAY SO...
2007-03-27 09:39:35 · answer #1 · answered by Where is reality? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Courtney Cox is an idiot for getting involved with this stupid sleazy show. She could have done a lot of other things I'm sure than this tabloid piece of cr*p. Sure she wanted to do something different, but did she have to crawl into the garbage dump to do it? Her kissing Jennifer is for ratings but it's also the kind of junk the show deals in. It's also true that Jennifer is the only one with a thriving career. Though I did think Lisa Kudrow's show was not bad.
2007-03-27 10:17:23 · answer #2 · answered by carol j 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, because one 'friend' can't really have much success without the others. Look at Lisa Ludrow(The Comeback) and Matt LeBlanc(Joey). Before Dirt, I hadn't really heard much(or anything) about Courteney Cox.
2007-03-27 08:12:25 · answer #3 · answered by BrownSuga 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here is the problem...enough is never enough for these people. I could take the money that either one of them are making on one rerun of friends and feed thousands of hungry people right here in the USA. I agree with you in everything you have said. I think that it is us as a society that makes these people so greedy. I mean my goodness you have teachers that are supposed to mold our children, and they are paid nothing, well in this case either one of this girls just have there name printed and make more money than a teacher does in several years. Yep things are just right down crazy. I think we need to get our priorities straight in this country. Great Question...!
2007-03-27 08:07:59 · answer #4 · answered by ransdoll90 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Other than the fact that you are talking about it right now, I don't think that that many people would care if they feed the homeless or were deep. That is not the purpose of an actress in our society. They are here to entertain us. You would not have posted something about it if it wasn't entertaining you even remotely. They are rich because of this.
An action always causes a reaction. Maybe you should look at your own life and see if it is as deep as you wish your idol Courtney Cox's life to be. Do you feed the homeless? Do you volunteer. Well why the hell should they. Maybe you do. I hope that you are deeper than the people you criticize. I don't want t judge you because I don't judge, I only suggest that if you complain about shallowness in our society that you are truly doing something about it.
2007-03-27 08:17:11 · answer #5 · answered by wilowmna 1 · 1⤊ 4⤋
its all for ratings... i havent heard one person mention that show "dirt"... so what better way to get people to watch... then to throw a hook...it'll have high ratings this week probably be cancelled in two months....its pathetic, juvenille and not necessary
2007-03-27 08:27:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
gartanius....what are you....15?
Yes, I agree with the poster. When I heard that I wondered if the Friends producers could get their money back.
2007-03-27 08:10:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
i agree with you, it is a desperate attempt to get attention
2007-03-27 08:20:41 · answer #8 · answered by sharks 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
o god they were acting git over it!!! i wish people would leave all famous people alone!!!
Pease M.C.
2007-03-27 08:54:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Who are you seeing for anger management?
2007-03-27 08:09:19 · answer #10 · answered by Bill in Kansas 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋