2007-03-27 07:53:37 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Sure would give new twist to the Republican Party and "family values." Who will be best man? Mark Foley or Tim Haggard?
2007-03-27 10:33:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the actual topic is FEDERAL funding of embryonic stem cellular study, no longer no matter if is could ensue. i'm sorry, yet in this debate, i will could aspect with Republican Senate Majority chief, bill Frist, M.D., who's conscious that the style of analysis continues to be in its very early ranges and that study could proceed. And the rationalization that is being suggested is because Rush Limbaugh extra the ad to nationwide interest. That became an area commercial that ran in Missouri. The sensible ingredient could've been to push aside the ad. Rush chosen to attack it. He made it an argument. And playstation -- Michael J. Fox did an ad for Republican Senator Arlen Specter in 2004 because Specter supported federal funding of embryonic stem cellular study. Fox isn't in it because of a political celebration association -- he's doing advertisements for the problem itself.
2016-12-02 21:56:20 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL If you guys spent nearly as much time coming up with solutions as you do worrying about Hannity and Rush, you *might* be able to accomplish something.
2007-03-27 08:13:18 · answer #3 · answered by Jadis 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great question...It's against the law for 2 guys to marry...except in NH...but neither live there so that is out...haha...i could see a Rush and Sean ticket...coulter would be press secretary of course...we'd have to keep Rove as COS...and cheney (since I know you have man love for him...lol) as SOD...ayyyy...lol
2007-03-27 08:05:42 · answer #4 · answered by Steelhead 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Should be Limbaugh and Coulter, so at least there's the appearance that one of them is a woman. They have to play to their base.
2007-03-27 07:58:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
The intelligence level is really declining on Y/A.
2007-03-27 07:56:43 · answer #6 · answered by Abu 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Maybe one of them should marry Olbermann. He never married.
2007-03-27 07:58:52 · answer #7 · answered by tabs 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Sounds fantastic to me! Perhaps such a union would assuage their acerbic and mean attitudes.
2007-03-27 08:04:04 · answer #8 · answered by rapsie01 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Sheehan and Penn should get together, Howard Dean can officiate and when they say I do, do that scream thing...
2007-03-27 08:02:10 · answer #9 · answered by garyb1616 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How about no. We do not need another substance abuser in office.
2007-03-27 08:01:04 · answer #10 · answered by adobeprincess 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋