2007-03-27 07:50:23 · 13 answers · asked by Truth For Liberty 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Obama, Edwards, and Kucinich. Everyone else Democratic is wishy washy on their answers or non-committal.
Republican Chuck Nagel is against it but he is not running yet.
2007-03-27 08:12:11 · answer #1 · answered by hello T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First off, I don't think anybody is "For The War".
Remember the people in the public and the House and Senate who demanded to know why "Intelligence didn't connect the dots" and were VERY critical about it.
There are some who see the big picture; that Islamic Fundamentalists are going to keep terrorising the world until the world gives in and they control the entire region. By that I mean, they control the oil wealth. When they can bring the world to their knees to "submit" then they will have complete and utter control of the world.
Some just believe that if we just talk, give them what they want (see the above) we will all be better off and they will leave us alone....say hello to $9 a gallon gas......
The biggest question is are we willing to allow another country that is controlled by Islamic Fundamentalists change the American way of life?
For the war, the answer is no
Against the war, the answer is yes
2007-04-04 07:20:49 · answer #2 · answered by USA 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama in 2008 Edwards VP
2007-04-02 10:40:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Barack Obama
2007-03-27 07:53:54 · answer #4 · answered by the king USA 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary says she is this week, but that changes every other week, so you're guess is as good as mine. She was all for it when we captured Saddam Hussein and it was a good political strategy to support the war.
Obama claims to have been against it from the beginning. THat's easy for him to say, however, because he was sitting in his living room at the time, so he never had to go on record about anything.
The democrats claim to support the troops in all of this, but I haven't seen any of them over here in the last 7 months.
2007-03-27 08:16:31 · answer #5 · answered by DOOM 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
All of the Presidential candidates IN BOTH PARTIES are going to go back and forth on this topic. It changes daily for ALL THE CANDIDATES IN BOTH PARTIES.
2007-03-31 17:11:05 · answer #6 · answered by Rhionnan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well there are currently some but they will Flip-Flop so many times before 2008 I don't think it would be good to write them down.
2007-03-27 08:18:33 · answer #7 · answered by George G 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama for sure, Clinton though I personally would not vote for someone like that, maybe Edwards is against it(I really haven't heard yet about him).
2007-04-01 04:50:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
none of them are not key point for that decision ,this is not one way road.UK is playing on its way ,Iraq&Iran&ifghanestan must look at them in same time in one hand and sude arab with Israeil on the other hand
in final word "OIL IS IMPORTANT"and cash flow of the oil is
"MORE IMPORTANT"
2007-04-03 18:02:31 · answer #9 · answered by Ali 5000 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Every one of the Demoncraps
2007-03-27 07:54:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋