It seems in the world today if you dare go against what America wants then your emasculated from the world with its many Americanised groups as in UN,NATO,WTO etc. Is it time other nations as in Russia,China started forming their own international policies and groups that serve their interests solely as opposed to solely American policy and their foreign interests. Apparently America is now deciding to bomb Iran on April the 6th without asking anybody but themselves if this is legal.
Is it time for Russia to get rid of the yolk of American dominance and world wide empire building for their own agenda and international policy?. The world has been bossed around by the US for far too long its now time for some change and fair play on the world stage, but will the US like sharing their world power status with another cultural and innovative powerhouse Russia?.
They can cry and whine all they like but they will have to except there is a new kid on the block now and its Russia.
2007-03-27 07:35:16 · 8 answers · asked by Robert T 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Get over the illusion, democracy doesn't exist. We just believe we have representative government. it isn't Russia, the US or China that controls the world. It is a small group of rich people called the Illuminati, who operate out of a secret organizational front called the Bilderburg estate..
2007-03-30 00:25:57 · answer #1 · answered by Boston Bluefish 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Russia isn't even close to being a superpower, politically or economically. They may still have there Big weapons (which they do). But I think China and India are a bigger threat. And yes democracy is good for all peoples and No one country has the right to tell you how to run your democracy. Otherwise it wouldn't be a democracy. POWER AND FREEDOMS TO THE PEOPLE!
2007-03-27 07:58:56 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what world do you live in???? every country in the world has policies that are there to benafit thier own country. countries like russa, china, and france constantly go against the us in the un for no other reason then to defy america. and i hate to break it to you but russia is not new on the block they were equal to america in every way before '88. comunism just don't work very well in the financial aspect
grow up and do some reading before you just go on an anti american rant
2007-03-27 07:41:17 · answer #3 · answered by MATTHEW B 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
China and Russia are going to be the democratic idealism states for the 21st century? why not add cuba and Venezuela?
2007-03-27 07:47:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hahahahah, Russia described as "a new kid on the block"
LOL
2007-03-27 07:41:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you could gown up socialism in spite of the shown fact which you like, in spite of the shown fact that that is nevertheless socialism. Socialism is rapidly at odds with a meritocracy, the place people who produce the main solid for society get rewarded the main. with the aid of fact socialism imposes arbitrary limits on wealth below the guise that socio-economic inequity is a foul element, societies that redistribute wealth from the individuals who earn it is going to constantly fall at the back of societies that reward the manufacturers. effective, capitalism isn't a real meritocracy. people who study to manage the equipment can gain unfair rewards. Monopolies, and in lots of circumstances super firms frequently, particularly produce consequences counter to that of the proper meritocracy. yet capitalism comes closer to a meritocracy than any equipment it particularly is centrally controlled or planned. as long as you keep the belief of countless rewards to those that gain place, I even have very few problems with issues like training and wellness care being publicly funded. once you initiate dictating how lots is adequate or maybe what a "honest salary" is, then I start to get a sprint ancy. A business company might desire to greater or much less be allowed to function in spite of the shown fact that it chooses, as long as that is not a possibility to human beings around it (dumping sewage into our rivers might qualify as a possibility). workers might desire to greater or much less be allowed to decide for whichever business company they like to artwork for, and could be unfastened to go around as frequently as they decide for.
2016-10-20 13:23:29 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you are stuck in the 70's. That war has already been fought; Russia lost.
2007-03-27 07:38:05 · answer #7 · answered by wizjp 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You idiot, democracy is a form of government not an American idea or developement.
2007-03-27 07:38:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋