We do realize that Congress backs an end to "COMBAT" operations, not the actual occupation ?

Question

We all know that it is all a play of words anyway?
Halliburton will remain there as a needed support.,as well as other foreign companies. The oil interests will also remain.
The word "Combat"(troops) will soften and become the "opposition troops" or a needed "security task force?"..

---------------
Today's headline reads:
"Republicans Soften Stance on Pullout Language
GOP Senators Willing To Let Bush Confront Iraq Timetable Issue"
Washington Post
Tuesday, March 27, 2007;

Unwilling to do the White House's heavy lifting on Iraq, Senate Republicans are prepared to step aside to allow language requiring troop withdrawals to reach President Bush, forcing him to face down Democratic adversaries with his veto pen.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) announced the shift in strategy yesterday, as the chamber took up a $122 billion war spending package that includes a target date of March 31, 2008, for ending most COMBAT operations in Iraq.

The provision, along with a similar House effort, represents the Democrats' boldest challenge on the war, setting the stage for a dramatic showdown with Bush over an otherwise popular bill to keep vital military funds flowing.

Answer 1

The media speaks again telling us exactly how we are to think of todays affairs, don't read it so I don't care what it says! I can think for myself!

Answer 2

That's great, we'll just stay there and do nothing while the terrorists pick our soldiers off one by one. Shitty plan if you ask me.