English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have heard and seen so much on here about how they are guilty of war crimes.... Somebody please explain to me what crimes have they committed....

2007-03-27 06:26:50 · 12 answers · asked by Johnny Mek 4 in News & Events Current Events

12 answers

Those rascals (Bush and Blair) have had the audacity to attempt to search for, capture, or kill all those peace loving, kind-hearted Islamic-fascists ...just because those Islamic-fascists like to cut innocent people's heads off, fly airplanes into buildings, use and abuse their woman, and teach their children to hate Jews and Christians.

Soooo, what don't you understand?

Bush and Blair are NOT politically-correct. Therefore, they have got to go!

2007-03-27 06:43:24 · answer #1 · answered by phil c 2 · 2 3

What war crimes did Saddam Hussein commit???

How many millions have Islamic fundamentalists killed???

Don't we have the obligation to do something?! Should we sit on our hands and say, "Okay, I'm not going to do anything about the people you choose to murder, just so someone won't think poorly of me..."???!!

This is truly absurd! If your little brother or sister were getting the tar beat our of them, would you do something? If a person was being attacked in broad daylight, in the middle of an intersection, would you just stand there???

Thank God someone did SOMETHING. Inaction=Death! Better to die standing up than laying down!

If you don't like the stance Islamic Fundamentalists have taken against the USA, maybe you should move some place safe, like Canada or France. Oh, wait. There have been incidents of terrorism there as well...

2007-03-27 07:27:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Blair , Brown and all the Liebour cronies that supported them like mac the spoon ought to be locked away in a secure place! by no capacity enable the labour scumbags forget approximately that we went to conflict on a lie , thousands and thousands died , Dr david Kelly exchange into murdered and now the islamic militants are continually out to strike lower back at us. This exchange into all on Labour's watch and once you bypass out to vote each and each time , do no longer forget approximately or enable your self to be conned via those crooks that are the Liebour social gathering!

2016-12-08 12:29:33 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

They have not committed any War Crimes. There are some radicals who believe that they have, though the crimes are imagined. There are some radicals who believe that actions that are *not* war crimes should become war crimes, though they are not war crimes at current.

2007-03-27 20:48:29 · answer #4 · answered by Henry W 3 · 0 0

Bush can not declare war unless the threat of nuclear attack is imminent.

The United Nations was put in place to prevent a III world war.

He blatantly went against the world in this.

He took prisoners that time has shown are not terrorist.

The proof is we have not heard of heinous crimes the military rounded up.

It can no longer be blamed on Bush because he has not been impeached it is now America at fault for war crimes.

The other nations will now see us as the terrorist and do what ever necessary to protect the rest of the world from us.

2007-03-27 06:45:15 · answer #5 · answered by granny_sp 4 · 2 3

-Aggression against Iraq and Afghanistan is the first crime. The court that tried the Nazis set up the precedent that aggression is the highest crime in international law (see Nuremberg Tribunal). The US is made responsible under international law for the half million dead in Iraq and all the innocent victims of the war on terror.
-Torture in Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and countless secret prisons. The program of extraordinary rendition violates basic sovereignty and human rights.

2007-03-27 06:59:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

they have commited no crimes, they have tried to liberate a country, is a shame that alot of the facts get lost in search for a news worthy story, the press has alot to answer for. it must be so bad for a country to be in war and yet less people are dying then when it was under rule by suddam

2007-03-27 06:38:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

I'ts a crime to invent faulty intelligence, go to war and then have thousands and thousands die for it.

2007-03-27 07:19:44 · answer #8 · answered by katydid 7 · 1 2

Invading a sovereign nation without cause or provocation and overthrowing a government to start...

2007-03-27 06:37:26 · answer #9 · answered by Mama Gretch 6 · 0 4

We need to blindly believe everything that we are told, because, clearly, we are never lied to, right???




http://video.google.com.au/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change

2007-03-27 06:45:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers