The recent turn out at anti-war protests fell well short of projections. Clearly, there is a dire need in the USA-hating activist community for more "boots on the ground".
Why are there so many liberals sitting at their computers bashing the war and the USA, instead of signing up at their local A.N.S.W.E.R. chapter?
Sure, they just want to send young, impressionable college students off to do their protesting for them. They would never risk arrest/imprisonment themselves.
2007-03-27 05:51:19 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, thats exactly what I have been wondering!
2007-03-27 05:53:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 10⤋
Communists are beset upon by enemies on all sides, they are the worlds greatest pacifists, they want the war to end.
I must ask in all sincerity, why do you insist in calling them liberals? They are far removed from liberal. A Marxist is a socialist is a communist when they can't get their way or their marxist theory collapses under its own weight. To continue to call them liberals gives them a respectability that they do not deserve.
2007-03-28 13:52:53 · answer #2 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You may impress othewr rightwing haters with your pseudo-intellectualism but not me.
You said of Democrats:
LOL!!! I don't think they own a bible and they use the constitution for toilet paper
On the Constritution:
"Its justa goddamn peice of paper!"
-George W. Bush.
Cut the crap.I am an ex-conservative because I am sick of the HATE you spew.
AND its typically ONLY liberals that risk arrest/imprisonment.
Nice try.
2007-03-29 02:59:39 · answer #3 · answered by Da Man 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all, and I'll keep repeating this for as long as it fails to sink in, people against the war are not limited to "liberals". If you disagree, I've got bad news for you: only 29% of the population falls under the "not liberal" category. Second of all, plenty of us do attend protests and do a lot more than post online. (Incidentally, what do YOU do other than post here, as long as you're going to make blanket-statement dismissals of anyone who doesn't agree with you on this war?) Lastly, you've got some nerve expecting people to take you seriously, when you obviously favor a war that you're not participating in yourself. I for one don't want people going to Iraq on my behalf or anyone else's. I want them out of harm's way, since it's obvious to any rational person that the situation there is an unwinnable quagmire that can only lead to more death and carnage.
2007-03-27 06:02:13 · answer #4 · answered by David 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
you would be unable to generalise. you're asserting each and each individual in Britain is a "Liberal pacifist"? It does not artwork like that. - we are scuffling with the Iraq conflict alongside the individuals. they are our allies and that they have performed a similar for us in the previous. uk troops are doing a good job available so how are you able to categorise them and say we are apprehensive of killing terrorists? particularly whilst lots artwork is accomplished via our police to eliminate the venture. - Why is it racist to hate muslims? you have responded your individual question - "i admire secular muslims". not all muslims are terrorists. You admit that your self. So this is racist to hate muslims as purely some have ever performed something incorrect. - Israel get "lots stick" for killing civilians because of the fact in any conflict or militant operation, civilian casualties would desire to be minimised. dismiss for this could bring about courtroom circumstances. undemanding. Terrorist assaults are seperate subject concerns. for the period of those, the extra advantageous reason IS to reason as many civilian casualties as plausible. this is disgraceful, yet you look lacking the factor. - no person "stands up for" a terrorist agency. i'm not even going to remark on the 9/eleven celebrations. Your question grew to become into crammed with sweeping statements and grew to become into headed via a declare that means that because of the fact British human beings are not stone hearted killers they approve or terrorism! in case you're actually not specific, no person will answer you appropriate. you will desire to be extra careful the type you observe your questions. This seems lots like a rant to me.
2016-11-23 19:23:08 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can thank the Armchair liberal with polio for getting you through the worst economic disaster of the 20 th century and winning the second world war.
2007-03-27 06:06:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
So the armchair-soldier sends the soldiers from poor neighborhoods to do their killing for them. Why are you on the internet and not at the recruiters office boy? I am liberal but far from a pacifist chump, I support beating down dirty republicans with nothing but my hands, boots, and whatever else I can get my hands on. If you would like a liberal to beat the pacifist inside you out, come on down to my southern bible belt community and I will set you free moron.
2007-03-27 06:24:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Why is it that Conservatives are all brain dead and stupid just like Bush and Cheney. This from you who sends others to fight and die in Iraq. Just like the draft dodgers Bush and Cheney.
BTW, the protest numbers were the highest in the History of our Country, you need to read more. I am refering to the world protest numbers. I see by your question that you also have never served and you are not in service now.
2007-03-27 06:03:11 · answer #8 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
We are certainly not #1.....it's not the 50's anymore, and other countries are just as "free" and "democratic" if not moreso,
I just think that there is something to be said for going into a BS war for suspicious reasons, you people can't even figure out the reason, but you have blind faith in the government,
I thought you don't like government,
where do you think most of the money for warfare comes from? YOUR TAX DOLLARS...
you would rather it be spent on bullsht wars than fixing healthcare or converting to renewable energy?
that's dumb..
2007-03-27 05:58:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Liberals will not stand behind anything........never have...never will. They get the young and impressionable all stirred up, with Ant-everything sentiments...then turn their back...
The Antis are the ones that would never put on a uniform and fight for anything......COWARDS
Same ones as in the 60s against VietNam....
We are not talking our leaders going to war....we are talking about the future citizens, fighting for what they will inherit.
Liberalism is a strange and incurable disease and is a danger to the USA
2007-03-27 05:56:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
You complain when there are not enough Liberals protesting, and you would certainly complain if there were to many Liberals protesting. I think you just like to complain. And you folks like to say that it is the Liberals that are the whiners. You have proved that to be b.s.
2007-03-27 05:59:47 · answer #11 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋