This is amazing how many people have not bothered to listen to exactly what has been said about Iran and who has said it.
Clue for the clueless - war scares increase ratings and we have been getting these exact same war scares every year for the past 25 years! Get a clue people.
2007-03-27 07:11:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by MikeGolf 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Funny how Russia only warns the US when they know the US has no serious plan to attack Iran, and especially not for 15 Britsh sailors. Iran knows that too, that's why they still have the sailors. It's dajavu because Iran did the same thing to british vessel when old man Bush warred with Iraq. Putin is a Putts, the Russian military is a joke and financed by America, just like their space program. We've been carrying Russia for years with Jew funds produced by American Goyim labor.
2007-03-27 07:18:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by da2 d 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the past two months, President Bush has continually ratcheted his war rhetoric against Iran in truly exponential terms. He announced that he was sending two more aircraft carrier groups to the Persian Gulf, and since that statement, even more military muscle has been dispatched.
Lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle are clearly worried that the President may try to extricate himself from the Iraqi morass by spreading the war northward to include Iran. In the Cutting Edge Newsletter of January 20, we quote former Attorney General Wesley Clark as saying that, since the President is clearly trying to provoke Iran, Congress should begin impeachment proceedings against him on that basis alone!
But, no one is asking the truly burning question: Will Russia allow America or Israel to mount a successful attack on Iran's nuclear facilities? President Bush is reportedly contemplating the use of tactical nuclear weapons, especially "bunker busters". Already, the peoples of the world see that America is the only nation on earth to actually use nuclear weapons during a time of war, and aimed those awful weapons directly toward the civilian populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Another American attack using nuclear weapons would truly shatter most relationships other countries would have with the United States.
However, such an attack would also irrevocably damage Russia's standing with the global Islamic community, to the point where no one would trust Russia's capabilities any more; and we think that scenario does not run consistent with the prophesied Ezekiel 38-39 invasion, in which Russia leads an alliance of mostly Islamic nations in an End of the Age attack on Israel
2007-03-27 05:51:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Brite Tiger 6
·
0⤊
5⤋
Well since Iran stop paying Russians and they voted for the resolution condemning Iran.
Maybe you should focus on the country who is funding the sucide bombers.
Never mind I leave you to your liberal view of the world.
2007-03-27 05:48:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Hmm, I dont know if they should warn. But, they gotta point there. We are in a war already. We have troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. We cant afford to send more troops to Iran!
2007-03-27 05:47:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by hot_rican_4_ju 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Russia is a meaningless speck. They can posture all they want, it will not change that fact.
2007-03-27 05:52:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sane 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
well they to see us save an another embarrassment..
2007-03-27 05:49:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by eviot44 5
·
0⤊
3⤋