Personally, I think she was. It's wierd how the same drug found in Anna's body was found in Daniel's. Howard was present at the time of both deaths. Could it be that he just want money from them? They "claim" that there was no "foul play" -- HELLO?!?! He's a lawyer -- can he go around the law!!! But what do you think?
2007-03-27 05:41:22 · 17 answers · asked by Chuchie_Lipsz 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
TO ADD ON: It's not about not letting her rest in peace. It was question that I wanted to ask. If you sick and tired of media gossip, simply don't answer my question. No one is forcing you -- any of you to answer any questions on this site. I wanted to know if people had the same opinions as I did. I asked -- you answered and there it is. No one is trying to spread any gossip that has ALREADY been going around. I'm not trying to add any more fuel to the fire. Many people has been speculating that Anna was murdered since we first heard she passed. So no one is spreading anyting. Ugh! *rolls eyes*
2007-03-27 07:14:28 · update #1
I do not believe that Anna Nicole would end up her life because of Daniel's death. She was pretty happy with the girl and was going to continue her fight for the money.
On the other hand she overdosed on sleeping pills just like Marilyn Monroe who was her role model to the point where she even made a request to be buried as close as possible to her.
In my personal opinion all of this tragedy was carefully planned by Howard, and I am agree with the Judge who called him an "enabler". I think Howard did not stick around Anna for last 10-12 years for nothing, but he was pushing her and her son towards the kind of life where they both would end up with "accidental death" and he would end up with a child who is worth $500 million in the country that does not require to have DNA test to claim paternal rights (such as Bahamas).
Her final autopsy report is available on line and I am including a link below.
http://www.aolcdn.com/tmz_documents/ans_autopsy_report_wm.pdf
So you decide.
2007-03-27 05:53:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No I do not. It was a combination of medications. True her and Daniel had some of the same drugs in their bodies, but he was a young boy experiencing life, probably around drugs most of his life, so he thought he would try them. His mother was in the hospital,giving birth to Dannielynn and I am sure Daniel had access to her house so he helped himself!!!! A lot of kids steals medication from their parents to get high. Howard had nothing to gain by their deaths since he was not in her will. Yes he was executor, but that does not entitle him to any of her estate. H***, he got more from her while she was alive, Why would he want her dead? I truly don't understand the way people think. If the will had left everything to Howard then yes, there would have been a motive for him to kill her. Sad, but I hope they both may be able to RIP soon!!!
2007-03-27 06:09:12 · answer #2 · answered by ® 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was an accidental overdose which could happen to anyone. Her dr should have been aware of all the medications she was taking for her various problems {depression, pain, anexity, allergies, infection and so forth} she ran a temp of 105 which is deadly was asked if she wanted to go to the Dr and refused. As an adult she had the right to refuse and did. I think ppl are trying to find someone to blame and the only person to blame is Anna herself. She made a choice that ended her life, let her be
2007-03-27 06:18:08 · answer #3 · answered by texas_angel_wattitude 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I so..I think howard planned on keeping the both druggies until she wont the court battle over her old hubbies estate...he was pushing to marry her for the last year but she never did it. I think he wanted to marry her and then kill her off so he can gain her estate and money. And that after he was in the clear, he can do away with anna and daniel and blame it on drugs. He is a lawyer..he knows how to cover it up. That is why he refuses to let go of the baby or take the dna for so long because he knows that baby is his only leg to stand on. I pray that baby is Larry's and that stern is thrown out of the bahamas and left with nothing.
2007-03-27 05:54:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
And conspiracy theories continue.
Did man land on the Moon?
Did Mark Chapman shoot John Lennon?
Was the F.B.I. involved in the shooting of J.F.K?
Is Global Warming a 'man-made' disaster, or just a fluctuation in the 4.5 billion year of cooling and warming?
Who killed Marilyn Monroe?
Who killed Princess Diana.
Wow.
There are a lot more things affecting us than wondering about which money-grabbing bint stole the money from the 82 year old man (who just 'happened to be a billionnaire)
It''s sick.
And if she wasn't a Prostitute, then 'she' has certainly deserved her outcome.
She was a brainless 'model', giving nothing back to society.
She's a talentless bimbo, who relies on the stupidity of the vacuous bimbos who insist on setting vapid quesions
I have seen many questions, being about Britney Spears, or as they spell it Brittant, Brittnay, Brittany', Brittney, Brittannay, Brritney, Brittnney, Bartnee, or whatever dislocation from reality the questioners desire?
Is there a point when I just assume there is noone on here, who share's the same thoughts?
They are insipid, and irrellevant.
I've noticed that the worst of the 'twinkies', seem to think she's
2007-03-27 06:11:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. I think it is typical when a celebrity dies prematurely, conspiracy theorists start speculating about how the death could really have been a murder. Like with Marilyn Monroe. People still think the Kennedy's did it. Sometimes people do overdose. And I don't think it is strange that they had the same drug in them. Maybe she gave him her drugs or maybe they had the same doctor. Who knows.
2007-03-27 05:47:12 · answer #6 · answered by kayaress 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I absolutely agree that there is no way that she accidently O.D. , i think its is really weird cause Daniel died of the same thing only a little while back but also remember the rich guys son who dropped dead to! lots of rich people dyeing thats really curious. Howard i dont know but it is a posibility but it was definetely about the money!
2007-03-27 05:56:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It was an accidental overdose. And Howard Stern was NOT present at Annas death. Leave it alone and quit starting rumors that are not true. Let her RIP.
2007-03-27 05:46:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Don't want to be hateful, but who cares?
Who cares about Paris, Brittney, K-fed, Justin, Nicole, Anna... who cares?? These people have done nothing for humanity except get kids to spend there babysitting money on the crap they don't need!!!
I feel better.. thanks!
2007-03-27 05:51:20 · answer #9 · answered by SoulRebel79 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why can't half the energy put towards anna nicole smith be put towards voting and actually being a part of our system?
in short about anna... who cares.... she lived fast and died fast... the brighter the candle, the faster it burns...
2007-03-27 05:46:23 · answer #10 · answered by bilko_ca 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋