Wealth is finite. Not everyone can have it. Therefore, does the country work to keep people poor in the interest of keeping the rich in power (as well as thinning out the rich as well) We can't all have money otherwise no one would be rich.
2007-03-27 05:28:29 · 11 answers · asked by trer 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
I think America loses with this theory because the more we keep the poor and/or middleclass down the more aid is needed in the form of welfare and food programs. These programs in turn are funded by raising taxes. As far as keeping the rich in power money doesn't give power knowing what to do with it does
2007-03-27 05:37:59 · answer #1 · answered by Denise J 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
America's poor? Well, let's just take a look at that. Here in Houston, we still have 20,000 Katrina refugees. And after much howling and moaning from them, , FEMA has agreed to entend their free rent for another 6 months. And no, they are not holed up in some slip shod apartment buildings. Far from it. The "poor" know how to work the system. It's the middle class that bears the burden.
2007-03-27 05:40:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's in the Jews interests to flood the country with mestizos to lower the standard of living, increase the crime and eventually run Whites out of this country. The jew media and liberal elite controlled by the jew promoted the same thing in South Africa and Rhodesia.
The Jews deserve a REAL holocaust for what they are doing to the world. HItler was right about the jews all along. Too bad he couldn't finish the job he started.
2007-03-27 05:36:59 · answer #3 · answered by thetruth_00 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You gave no hint as to how you believe the rich are stopping you from making a heap of dough. Many have started poor and bacame filthy rich. No attempt was made by those already rich to stop it.
2007-03-27 05:35:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ask some one for another country and they will tell you America has no poor--even our poorest of poor have it better than most countries. It works great to have different classes high, medium and low--keeps the economy going. I just hope to get on the high side one day!!
2007-03-27 05:34:54 · answer #5 · answered by I'm so cool 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so... I think that there is a lot of money to made its only smart business people or talented people who take advantage of it. I mean there are hard working people who deserve more but many of them don't want it -- but why should we give money to those who don't work for it -- and hate on those who do?
2007-03-27 05:32:48 · answer #6 · answered by Okaydokay21 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wealth is not finite, resources are and we are not anywhere near using them up. When one group prospers, we all prosper. I do not gain by taking stuff from you.
2007-03-27 05:52:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was always under the impression that the very idea of wealth was what kept us seperated. Of course, that's backwards communist terrorist thinking.
2007-03-27 05:39:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, it is in the interests of THE DEMOCRAT LEADERSHIP only to keep people poor and dependent on them. it is the only way for them to stay in power...just ask pelosi, sharpton, jackson, kennedy, clinton, gore, schumer, et al...
2007-03-27 05:35:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There will never be too many wealthy people. It doesn't happen anywhere.
2007-03-27 05:32:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋