You wouldn't be able to move objects when time is stopped!
As for your details: I think there woul be a void (lack of matter) and a lack of space also, or else where would the matter go?
Also, an object can not be displaced without a force acting upon it, (F=ma) in the case of the object "m" (which is the mass of the object) -------> m=F/a, see, you are left with nothing because a mass is proportionnal to a force divided by an acceleration!
Conclusion, I think the object would actually vanish!
2007-03-27 04:54:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Yahoo! 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
If you move some object it will inherently have a calculable velocity, no matter how slow you move it. Since Velocity = Distance(or displacement) / Time, the question you ask doesn't make any sense because you would have zero as the denominator which would give an imaginary answer. Not only is there no such thing as stopped time, no objects would be able to exist without time so you couldn't even begin to try and move something.
2007-03-27 11:32:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The atoms would also not be able to move out of the way to make room for the displacement, so it is stuck,
however if you were able to move the atoms in the direction the object is being moved, then it would be like moving it very fast, almost like a wave front. Dense air in the direction of motion, with vaccuum behind.
2007-03-27 11:22:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by poseidenneptune 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Each dimension is independent of the others, ....
Moving something in the x-axis doesn't effect the y or z-axis..so therefore moving and object when time is stopped shouldn't have any affect on the other 3 dimensions.
To the observer in normal time, it will look like the object dissapeared an reapeared in another location....Kind of like stop motion filming.
2007-03-27 11:31:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by The Cheminator 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
In the classical theories of relativity and quantum mechanics, time is not quantized, but is a continuum having the character described above. However, if certain, as yet untested, theories attempting to unify relativity and quantum mechanics are correct--such as the theory of loop quantum gravity--then time will come in discrete pieces or atoms lasting about 10-43 second. There will be a shortest duration for any possible event, and time will be "digital" rather than "analog."
2007-03-27 11:25:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe that time and space are so intertwined that you can not move an object frozen in time. Mass movment and time are relevant to each other so one can not occur without the other. The only possibl way would be to rip it from the time stream all together in which case it would disappear and yes probably leave a vacuume.
2007-03-27 11:22:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by XeroAngel 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Time is a construct. A clock doesnt actually record time. If someone was supposedly moving so fast that everything else appeared to be standing still time would still not be stopped.
In that case though the shock of being moved so fast would kill a person. Inanimate object would be fine.
2007-03-27 11:26:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lupin IV 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
It is impossible to move an object when time is stopped as you will not even be able to move when time is stopped also u will not know that time is even stopped.
2007-03-27 11:20:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by eddie 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Atoms are constantly moving. If time stopped..the atoms stop. They'd act as a force field, holding everything in it's position until they move again.
2007-03-27 11:36:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bonnie Lynn 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
when you move the object, the molecules in the space you move it into will displace the molecules from where the object once was. this is not impossible because if its possible to somehow move the object, then its possible to move the air molecules as well
2007-03-27 11:36:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋