2007-03-27 03:23:00 · 15 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think of the millions spent on investigating Clinton that could have been put into a more favorable cause such as capturing these people. I think of the distraction of persecuting Clinton as opposed to prosecuting terrorist. I think of how much safer the world would be if we had left Iraq alone and concentrated an effort in Afghanistan. What a waste of time, and resources it was to only find out that the president was human and got caught doing a human thing.
2007-03-27 03:31:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
If we had gone after OBL and Al Qaeda and saved Saddam for later we would be much safer today. We would have cut the radical Islamic snake's head off before it could strike again but instead it strikes and strikes and strikes.
What clinton did was between two consenting adults, a man that happens to be POTUS and a bimbo. That can't even come close to comparing to the horrors of war and terrorism we have seen in the last 4 or so years.
2007-03-27 10:30:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I don't think too much effort went into capturing Clinton in the act, did it? More of the effort was spent on the investigation afterwards, and of course, the subsequent impeachment. I think Tripp and Lewinski did most of the capturing work. Should we send them to Afghanistan?
2007-03-27 10:30:07 · answer #3 · answered by Shrink 5 · 5⤊ 4⤋
America could have saved a billion of the tax payers dollars over the Clinton witch hunt.
2007-03-27 10:31:56 · answer #4 · answered by leonard bruce 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
The world WOULD have been a LOT safer if your boy Clinton was taking out Osama instead of getting head from Monica, thats where the failure occured.
2007-03-27 10:28:07 · answer #5 · answered by Sane 6 · 5⤊ 5⤋
The President is commander in chief and is his (or someday her) decision to make. Not Congress
Non Congressional approval didn't stop Clinton in Somalia, Bulkans, Kosovo.
2007-03-27 10:25:31 · answer #6 · answered by John 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
It was Clinton's job at the time...he didn't do it..As a matter of fact he refused to take Bin Laden when offered.
Im starting to wonder about the water quality in Chicago....
2007-03-27 10:30:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Just think. Where could the money used to "catch" Clinton with his pants down, so to speak, could have been better spent ?!
2007-03-27 10:30:56 · answer #8 · answered by T S 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
GOP has done a great job in my state. No additional terrorist attacks since 911. How about yours?
2007-03-27 10:27:43 · answer #9 · answered by aiminhigh24u2 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Clinton might be the biggest threat to our security and future of any single person on the planet.
2007-03-27 10:27:32 · answer #10 · answered by Sherilynne B 3 · 3⤊ 6⤋