Will President Bush launch airstrikes on Iran before his term is over?

Question

Look at the war manuevers off the coast of Iran today? Its getting pretty close to it.


Peace,

Answer 1

I believe that will be up to Iran. How far will they push it? They have been spoiling for a fight for a long time. They are already at war with us anyway because they finance terrorist training and give them weapons to kill our people with.

Kobain, innocents will be hurt and killed, but our cowardly enemies hide among them and there is no way to avoid it. They use that as a propaganda tool because they know some folks will cave into this, and thats what they want. Our soldiers dont need to wear blue helmets. They need their hands untied so they can do their job without fear of prosecution.

Answer 2

Yes this is what Bush wants, more war in the MIddle East. It is being manipulated and pre-planned so that it looks like Iran "deserved" it. It's really too bad only about 1 out of 100 Americans can see the game he's playing. Most Americans refuse to admit that Bush has whitewashed the nation in dirty politics.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070327064437AAYOAvO&r=w

Answer 3

That is up to Iran.
Taking people and threatening to wipe nations off the map.
Also sending weapons into Iraq that are killing our troops.
Ingoring the UN and now has resolutions against them.

The ball is in Iran's court.


Not Bush's so think about it.

Answer 4

until there grow to be provocation (like an attack on the US or US interest), it would be problematic for Bush to get this going. besides the undeniable fact that, if there grow to be an attack on the US, I consider you. numerous years in the past, I examine a John Grisham e book the place a presidential candidate is given a leg up by using fact of an engineered (via his supporters interior the US) terrorist attack. For some reason, even in spite of the incontrovertible fact that this grow to be like 10 years in the past, I continually had John McCain's face in my head. that's strange, by using fact no longer something suitable to the character's actual description lined up.

Answer 5

We are playing a game of chicken with Iran. Just a soon as one of their French made Silkworm missles is on its way to one of our ships in the Gulf, I gaurantee Shock and Awe. See you later Nuke plants of Peace.
Standing up to the Punk on the block.

Answer 6

I think it is worthy to look at the consequences of past US actions against civilians. The term is blowback and it is the unwanted result of harming civilians. Innocent deaths result in desperate and angry populations willing to do anything to stop and harm their attacker. The 9-11 attack was justified as a retaliation for the US military presence in Saudi land during the Second Gulf War (Dubya's is the Third).
Dubya may be hell bent on controlling the Middle East, but the US population should look out for itself, avoid future terrorist attacks and pull out of the Middle East. The only presence of US soldiers in the world should be under blue hats, shoulder to shoulder with the international community.

Remember, when the government bombs civilians abroad, it endangers civilians at home.

Answer 7

We can only hope...

It is all coming to fruition. Everything is in place and soon the rest of the U.S. will understand the other reason (besides WMD's, which overwhelming evidence has shown they had) we are in Iraq & Afghanistan. It is time to cut the head of the poisonous snake that sits in Tehran.

Answer 8

probably. Bush has started two wars while his presidency, which isn't common in any other country here except for Africa and the middle east countries. For a civilised country, they are doing alot of war and costing the population alott of money.

Answer 9

Who knows what he is thinking? Maybe he'll attack the Brits or the French. Hey he might try to invade the moon.

Answer 10

I hope so! Make Tehran a sheet of glass baby!