What I feel is wave nature of light can also account for photoelectric effect if we reconsider nature of light. light is considered both as particle and as wave but there is no mean of visualising both nature of light.What I believe is, light is a particle(charged) moving in a manner that its path forms a wave we already know that when a charged particle is stationery it only has electric field but when it is moving it has both electric and magnetic field while we know light has both electric as well as magnetic field therefore can't we consider light as chrged particles moving in wave form one question may arise that if light considered as particle(charged) moving in wave form than what is the restoring force maintain such wave,then it is the electric and magnetic forces acting on moving charged paricles which make particle of ligh vibrate as wave. If this proposed nature of light is accepted than it would account for optical as well as photoelectric phenomenon. please contact me.
2007-03-27 02:36:00 · 2 answers · asked by umesh the unconventional 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
Humm...nice question, you are right to much extent, may be the particle you are talking about is pie-meson which is responsable for nuclear binding energy, you known that pie mesons can be charged. U should not shair your discoveries with the world like this.....keep it private may be some one will steal ur ideas and become famous for it!
2007-03-27 05:20:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, you should definitely keep these ideas to yourself!
2007-03-28 04:04:41 · answer #2 · answered by Dr Ditto 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋