I wouldnt put it past these neo-con chickenhawk liars
2007-03-27 02:27:38 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't think the troops wanted to be captured but since they follow their commanders orders, they could have been sacrificed.
2007-03-27 02:36:35 · update #1
You know....it doesn't sound so crazy to me. You just never know.
2007-03-27 02:30:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 12⤋
The disaster did not quite start up with the capture of two Israeli squaddies (Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev) via Hezbollah's Operation actual Promise in the Sha'ba Farms section (claimed via the two Lebanon and Israel.) The kidnappings offered a severe situation for Israel, yet would desire to not, via themselves, define the geopolitical venture. That definition got here whilst Hezbollah rockets struck Haifa, Israel's 0.33-best city, on July 13. there have been additionally claims coming from Hezbollah, and shown via Israeli officers, that Hezbollah had missiles obtainable that would desire to attain Tel Aviv. Israel's inhabitants is concentrated in the Tel Aviv-Jerusalem hall and in the Tel Aviv-Haifa hall. In result, Hezbollah had attained the skill to strike on the Israeli heartland. conflict is extreme priced in terms of life and aspects. This conflict isn't an excuse to start a conflict with Iran.
2016-11-23 18:58:09 · answer #2 · answered by mondesir 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This isn't the first time this has happened,and it wont be the
last.A few years back a similar incident occurred and our
troops were released,this is just another muscle flexing
exercise by Iran(trying too save face,after the vote for
sanctions).They will hold onto our soldiers for a while,
then let them go.
2007-03-27 03:04:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sure they did. I'm certain they want to put themselves at the risk of being beheaded.
After reading this ridiculous question, I hope we do not get another dem in the Whitehouse. This just proved to me you are all a bunch of mindless idiots.
Now you are flip flopping just like Kerry. First you wrote the troops were captured on purpose, now you write they were the victims of taking orders from their commanding officers.
2007-03-27 02:31:18 · answer #4 · answered by Sparkles 7 · 10⤊ 1⤋
Yea, that's it.
That Tony Blair is a piece of work, isn't he?
He and Bush had a secret meeting at Haliburton Headquarters where they planned the whole thing...then he went to dinner with his wife...Morgan Fairchild!
Yeah, that's it.
Seriously Brenda, what is so frightening is that people like you are walking around unsupervised.
You really are clueless, girl.
2007-03-27 02:32:54 · answer #5 · answered by Garrett S 3 · 9⤊ 0⤋
Yes. And about a dozen Poles sacrificed themselves way back in 1939 to lure Germany into a war it didn't want.
2007-03-27 02:30:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 0⤋
Excellent Read between the lines Josef!
Yes, America, UK and Australia are to BLAME. In fact, they invented Islam 1700 years ago just so they could start wars today!!!
You are so insightful..you should run for congress!
2007-03-27 02:30:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 13⤊ 0⤋
Brenda. I am sure you are not that stupid! The consequences
are far too great, to play the fool! The Royal Navy is there at
the request of the iraqui's!
2007-03-27 02:32:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
Drinking Kool-aid with Rosi?
2007-03-27 02:31:36 · answer #9 · answered by garyb1616 6 · 8⤊ 0⤋
Hi Katrina/Lisa/Brenda etc. -- Well, this is the first time I've heard of non-Americans being called "neo-cons".
No, they didn't.
What color is the sky in your world?
2007-03-27 02:35:30 · answer #10 · answered by Chiquita 2 · 6⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it very much. The US and UK don't have enough troops, country support, availability of weapons, etc., to get into another war.
2007-03-27 02:32:09 · answer #11 · answered by auditor4u2007 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋