What do you think about President George W. Bush, finally, finally, (finally) getting fired up? It sounds like he's finally gotten mad and he's calling Democrats by name. He's not saying my opponents, my respected good friend opponents. He's calling the Democrats. He's calling them on the carpet
THE PRESIDENT: 3/23/2007
" Instead, Democrats in the House, in an act of political theater, voted to substitute their judgment for that of our military commanders on the ground in Iraq."
"Yet to score political points, the Democratic majority in the House has shown it is willing to undermine the gains our troops are making on the ground. Democrats want to make clear that they oppose the war in Iraq. They made their point. For some, that is not enough."
I hope this is not the last time the President exposes to the public, who the democrats really are.
2007-03-27
02:10:57
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Wizard of Ahhs
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
The Democrats keep assuming they won Congress because of the war, when I think they won just because people like checks and balances in America. They got tired of the Republicans being able to send anything and everything through. So, the Democrats keep saying, see, you voted for us because you want us out of Iraq, it is the oldest trick in the book, because eventually people will forget why they voted a Democratic Congress in in the first place, and will assume, that, yea, hey, we gotta bring our troops home etc etc.
Dems, stop assuming that because the American people voted for you to take Congress that means we want to give up in Iraq, that is not the reason you won at all.
Also, why is it you aren't whining and pouting about the voting machine scandal now, oh right, because you won. . . this time.
2007-03-27 04:40:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Wolfgang92 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Let me guess...your one of those that think that the President was right all along, at attacking Iraq? You believe that regardless of how many soldiers are killed in a "war" or civil war that has been waged for thousands of years, will somehow vanish, because the president has some sort of plan? You believe that the president, by naming democrats is a sign that he is stronger? Why didn't he mention the fact that there are a bunch of republicans that also voted for the end of the war? Why has he changed his policy, time and time again? Why did he fire all of the generals in the field that didn't have his "master plan" and who wanted the war to end as well? When will Bush realize that he made a mistake going to war in the first place, admit that he was wrong, and try to find a DIFFERENT way to resolve the issues? Maybe we should send HIS daughters to the front lines to fight for what their Dad thinks?
2007-03-27 02:19:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by auditor4u2007 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
True... if we learned ANYTHING from Vietnam... you don't make descisions for the commanders who are on the ground. I don't know why the Dems think their judgement is better than those who are there. When they say the Citizens... whos opinions are based on news reports who say nothing about all the good things that are going on in Iraq... we know that mob rules have no logical basis but run by the cattle effect... they ARE undermining any progress for liberty. They will find out that they are wrong but much too late. The we'll have four years of stupidity followed by another act to fix things again.
2007-03-27 02:17:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by madbaldscotsman 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
i'm hoping to on no account stumble upon Dr. Jones - He might choose my paunch as data that i'm an unworthy glutton. He might choose my extreme blood rigidity as data that i'm lazy and don't workout. He might choose my bunions as data that I placed vogue in the previous convenience. And he could be incorrect on all counts. Does Dr. Jones comprehend that 60% of human beings on medicaid are seniors voters in nursing homes so ill that they have exhausted all of their medicare limits and their very own sources. What way of existence disaster leads to human beings becoming previous and then ill? Does Dr. Jones think of for one minute that 'very own duty deficit' is a reason to no longer take care of ailment or does Dr. Jones think of that ailment dealt with decrease than such situations should not be paid for? for somebody who graduated scientific college, Dr. Jones seems to have some considerable cognitive deficits, and a entire loss of empathy and compassion. everyone who turns an anecdote right into a cultural indictment without information the better actuality is the two an awl grinder with and time table, or purely very undesirable at severe thinking. In the two case this guy or woman should not be working in direction of drugs.
2016-10-20 01:13:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush should a page from Truman's presidency by lashing out against his enemies during his lame duck years.
When Truman left office he had the lowest ratings of any president including the present day Bush.
Since then history has been kind to by rating him a one of the most favorite.
2007-03-27 02:39:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sgt 524 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
blah blah blah...so why does this clown, who did NOT serve in Vietnam because of daddy's money, think that he knows more than his military commanders on the ground in Iraq? Seems to me like people have finally woken up and Bush is running scared.
You must be one of the wealthy/privileged few who have benefitted from the Bush Adminstrationsn's foreign policy. Lucky you.
2007-03-27 02:35:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes Mr President we democrats are full up to here with the war you started with KNOWN LIES
For the past 4 years you have substituted your judgement for the judgement of our military leaders on the ground and in fact have fired every general that told you that you were wrong, now we the people are back incharge and there's gonna be hell to pay for what you've done to our country
2007-03-27 02:24:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
I just hope he keeps it up. He has spent the better part of six years trying desperately to get along with and accommodate democrats. They just turn around and stab him in the back.
He should stand up to these people.
2007-03-27 02:42:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jacob W 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
a few points:
first, only 28% of the population is actually supporting this president's policy right now
second, rather than calling the democrats names..... perhaps he needs to find a way to keep our soldiers from dying everyday in Iraq
thirdly, democrats are questioning our presidents decisions which is a constitutional right...... since he hasn't done anything right since........ i can't remember. the debacle in Iraq, Katrina, the outing of a CIA by his boys, and the firing of US attorneys has made his decisions and judgment questionable.....
2007-03-27 02:22:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
i have seen W get cranked up before, only to back down later.
i just don't know...seems like nothing can keep him fired up for long...he's been grimly determined in the War on Terror,,,which is a good thing, but he grabs his ankles much too quickly in front of the Dem's.
2007-03-27 02:15:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋