.....ever goes to public functions and doesnt wear any kni(kers under her dress.
2007-03-27 02:10:40 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
a bet she wears a red lacy thong!
2007-03-27 02:13:46 · answer #1 · answered by Keira 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
That's an atypically vile comment from a peasant.
Her Majesty is rumoured to not even have lavatories in Her Majesty's residence as they are superfluous.
2007-03-27 12:58:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way! Ladies of a certain age were loads of undergarments big pants, petty coats etc etc
2007-03-27 09:15:33 · answer #3 · answered by bez 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. I've met the Queen. Believe me that woman is so immaculate I doubt she would go commando.
2007-03-27 09:13:33 · answer #4 · answered by Misha-non-penguin 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Surely she is now at the age where some nice big knickers to hold the Tena Lady pad in place are required.
2007-03-27 09:21:35 · answer #5 · answered by corny, but still never was a cornflake girl 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
there has been documentries on the queens clothes and there was a woman on there who makes the queens underwear so yes she does
2007-03-27 20:03:05 · answer #6 · answered by friendofb 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't think so. She was raised as a lady, and most ladies wear undergarments.
2007-03-27 20:54:34 · answer #7 · answered by Sandy Lou 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Reading most of the answers so far, reminds me of the saying"people who have no respect for themselves, have none for others" QED
2007-03-27 12:25:02 · answer #8 · answered by Raymo 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Naughty boy!
2007-03-27 09:13:26 · answer #9 · answered by The Oak 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She is a very dignified lady and always does the right thing.
2007-03-27 09:14:34 · answer #10 · answered by celianne 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
who cares?
why should one person be born with a crown on her head, and another not?
having a royal family is pointless and backwards!
2007-03-27 15:33:23 · answer #11 · answered by Soylent 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋