Why did people in America fight for their independence from England?

Answer 1

They were being required to pay taxes to England. However, noone in the British government was considering their concerns. There was noone there to represent the colonies. Taxation without representation.

Answer 2

The very vocal minority swayed public opinion.

Taxation:
All the supposedly unjustified taxes were actually still lower than anywhere else in the Empire, and they were taxes to help pay off the debt incurred in protecting America during the French Indian War.

Representation:
America had been offered full representation in Parliament and refused many times. Also there was an ambassdor in Parliament who could talk but not vote.
The whole taxation without representation is actually because they believed they should have had their own version of Parliament that answered to the king, who's authority was not questioned. (Notice that everything in the Dec of Independence says King Geoge did something, when in reality he was not involved in any of those decisions). The Americans early on tried to make it clear that Parliament had no power, that they were answering only to the king.

Tea:
The East indian Trading company was given a monolopy in America to help fight their financial problems. They had heavy price restrictions and taxes imposed on them. This lowered the price of tea. However, Americans got upset about the monolopoly and protested.

Read Common Sense by Paine, it is an excellent example of propaganda used to justify an unjustified war.
Sorry to say that, but it was unjustified in the sense that all the reasons given for going to war were intentionally misleading just to support the goals of the people pushing for war (mostly because they would profit from the split from Brittain). Not at all trying to say that it was wrong though; just that the people in control used unjust methods for getting involved.

Answer 3

A variety of reasons actually.
1. The American colonies were very apt smugglers and allowed to get away with it until after the French and Indian wars. The British had already tapped out the home country in terms of taxes to pay for the war and so turned to the American colonies (who were actually responsible for the war in the first place because the not yet General Washington blundered into French territory sparking off an international incident) The British actually lowered the tax on molasses from 3 pennies to1 but they enforced the payment.
2. Also after the French and Indian war, to thank the Indians who fought on their side the British wished to honor the treaties made with them and not allow the colonies further westward expansion. You can just imagine how that went over.
3. Then there was something about the British allowing Catholic priests into Canada. The largely protestant population in the American colonies was not happy about the British supporting a false religion.

Don't get me wrong. I love my country and I love the enlightenment principles the Constitution was founded on. But that doesn't mean I'm prepared to believe patriotic myths.

Answer 4

The British spent a great deal of money defending the colonies. The colonies had no representation in the British Parliament, but they also did not pay enough taxes to cover the cost of defense. The British levied heavy takes on sugar, stamps, tea, and other goods over the course a 10 year period or so leading up to the revolution. The colonists balked at this and boycotted goods.

The grievances against King George are clearly laid out in the Declaration of Independence.

Answer 5

the single China coverage states that the %is the only valid authorities of China. the single China coverage does no longer state that Taiwan is area of China. right here are remarkable: (a million) President Reagan's Six Assurances of 1982 obviously observed that the US does no longer understand chinese sovereignty over Taiwan. (2) interior the Senate-ratified San Francisco Peace Treaty of April 28, 1952, Japan renounced the sovereignty of Taiwan, yet China became no longer certain because the recipient. (3) From the outbreak of the Pacific warfare on Dec. 8, 1941, to the modern, there aren't any US authorities records which say that the sovereignty of Taiwan has ever been transferred to China. for this reason, the US helps the single China coverage because the Republic of China in Taiwan is neither the valid authorities of Taiwan, nor the valid authorities of China. The ROC in Taiwan is purely (a million) a subordinate occupying potential, starting up Oct. 25, 1945, and (2) a authorities in exile, starting up Dec. 1949. there has been no change in this status as a lot as now. for this reason, (to paraphrase the unique statement) Taiwan has that is personal DEMOCRATIC authorities which left the mainland to get faraway from the COMMUNISTS, and fled in exile to occupied Taiwan to kill and torture the Taiwanese. truthfully such an act merits OPEN help from u . s .. (who're you kidding?) Or has u . s . replaced that is view on Democracy and Communism? I doubt that! once the Republic of China leaves Taiwan, u . s . could say it helps Taiwan no matter if it ought to be self sustaining or no longer. What ever handed off to FREEDOM (or Liberty because the individuals opt for to call it). If the Republic of China won't be able to provide help to the Taiwanese human beings's aspirations for self-governing status, why would not the ROC only save quiet, quite of mendacity to the international community by technique of asserting that that's a sovereign and self sustaining u . s .? after all, the territorial sovereignty of the elements of "Formosa and the Pescadores" hasn't ever been transferred to China. at the same time as will ROC authorities officials provide up worshiping the almighty dollar or purely worrying about their personal interests and commence doing THE MORALLY suitable ingredient?

Answer 6

Why do people fight for Independence from any country??
Look, no one particular country prefers or likes any one country or person telling or demanding that you do as I say or otherwise.
Irish did not like the English etc either. We are who we are and we prefer to do what we want.
Politics - Religion - Rules - Laws are all so different in every shape and form.
Whether one is Black White or yellow - Muslim- Christian- Bud dist etc etc.
We humans are in one way or another are a force to be dealt with when it comes to who is Boss.
It all depends on who is the strongest leader and who we believe is the best person to rule at the time.

No one person is indispensable

Answer 7

Some reasons:

1) Parliament was taxing the Americans without representation

2) The English were limiting settlements west of the Appalachians

3) The English were holding trial of Americans without a jury (which was a basic English right)

Answer 8

All this is true of course! But we have been friends ever since
You can't win them all. We ruled the world for a very long time! Now the U.S is king. God bless the king!

Answer 9

yet america is not in controle of americans. even they have no
way to talk about this point.no where democracy is as afraid as america.real free ppl live in another place ,and they need air to breath ,you know earth is full of air.

Answer 10

No taxation without representation