Could Iran's rising threat to the Middle-East bring an end to the Arab/Israel conflict?

Question

I asked this question yesterday and didn't get a reasonable answer.
The Sunni donminated Arab countries see Shiiti donimated Iran as a growing threat and destabilizing factor in the Middle-East. Saudi Arabia is pushing to restart talks with Israel that have been stalled for over 10 years. Many Arab nations and Isreal have agreed to start talking again through Condi Rice.
Is it possible that this Sunni/Shiiti conflict, which has brewed for a thousand years, hepl bring a settlement to the Arab/Israel conflict. Can this become a case of the enemy of my enemy becoming my friend?

Answer 1

This is like a horse race ,with countries jockeying for position .
Its never going to be over till God returns and as I submit often that is never going to happen .
If you want the Middle East and for that matter the world to live in peace religion must end .
These wars are over Biblical lands promised to one tribe or another and it seems everyone has some claim to land others are living on depending on which holy script you possess .

It would be like three patent offices or three title departments all approving patents and land titles .

Depending on who's paper work you like at the time depends who has what .

So religion and governments are at the center of the conflict .
Remove them and people are just people who want a meal a place to sleep and some reproduction to happen so they have a sense of purpose in this life .

If we some how managed to stop all Middle East nations from building an army would it end conflict ?
I think (ok "not think" I am convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt)people would still commit violent crimes against others in the name of God .
So if we want an end to war in the region we need to establish an Atheist leader in each nation to replace the clerics and faithful leaders that rule today . Stop the building of armies and reach a set of laws that govern all nations . with an independent military that is able to punish nations that break the laws .
This means an end to current boarders and militarism's world wide .
I say we program a computer with the ability to launch a nuclear weapon that is locked on to a tracking device worn by the leader of every nation .
You or your people violate the law and its over for you .

Answer 2

We are talking about conflicts which are as old as time and very hard to predict. The question centers around who poses a greater threat to stability. I think most would say that Iran is the greater threat, but anti-Israeli sentiment is still a strong motivator in the regional affairs of the Middle East. I suspect that the answer is no. If Muslim governments begin to make real headway towards agreements with Israel, terrorist activity against those governments and their people will increase dramatically. This will create a question of whether the perceived benefit is worth the costs incurred. Personally, I say look to Gulf War I and the expected response from the Arab community had we entered Iraq at that time for your answer. They all knew Hussein was a threat to regional security, but were loathe to take action beyond expulsion from Kuwait. I think the same will happen with Iran. In the end Muslim brotherhood will trump cooperation with Israel on any meaningful scale.

Answer 3

enable see. one million. Israel did no longer lie to us. Israel informed us to no longer attack Iraq. many times. 2. Israel would not have organic and organic or chemical weapons. in line with possibility you're questioning of Syria and Iraq (which used to have them yet stopped a whilst decrease back). 3. Iran has many times threatened Israel and has been battling Israel via proxies e.g., Hezbollah. Heck, Iran is a possibility to ALL their buddies that's why the wikileaks scandal printed that the different Arab states have been all asking the U. S. to enable Israel bomb Iran's nuclear application or end it ourselves. 4. Israel has in no way threatened Iran with nuclear weapons. actually, Israel has in no way admitted they have any.

Answer 4

no,you are wrong .in truth none want a settle of palestine issue.every time when west going to attack a muslim nation it tried to bring the middle east talk in centre to get suport from muslim puppet goverment like saudia arabia,egypt and jordan .see the past case of attacking on afghanistan,iraq or now iran.other hand the risisng of iran is not a threat to other state but the israel that looks the interets of west and america.ask one question from israeli and west why they are agrreed to have talk with hamas led goverment to which they declared a terrorist organistaion and denied to talk in the past.the recent condi venture is no more than to fool the arab slave in the name of palestine.the whole world of islam will destroyed and even they will not get palestine, as israel policy to destroy the power of islam in return promise of palestine and when there would be not islamic power who will snatch the palestine from israel.The policy of west is like the divided policy of britian when it destroyed the muslim powerfull states one by one and when all destroyed it captured the mughal king and butchered his son and capture india.where muslim ruled for 8 hundred years.so do not worry the same thing will happen when israel and west will enter in makka and madina of saudia arabia.and the saud faily will butchered like great mughal bahadur shah zafar.

Answer 5

No. Iran hates Isreal.