2007-03-26 23:44:39 · 9 answers · asked by bushco43 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not take over. Just maybe quiet them down a bit.
2007-03-27 00:08:00 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The best way to fight a forest fire is to build a fire break and isolate the fire, not jump into the fire and try to stomp it out.
The Bush administration seems to be pushing for talks between the Arab nations and Israel to settle that conflict. For the first time, its seems this administration is acting with prudence.
Both the Sunni Arab world and Israel see the Shiiti Iranians as enemies. What better way to settle differences than come up with a common enemy that both sides hate more.
I was completely against the invasion of Iraq, but, if the settlement of the Arab/Israel conflict becomes an outcome, it may have been worth it.
Let's hope anyway.
2007-03-27 08:01:16 · answer #2 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I personally feel that they should not even think of such a step ...reasons to support my views are as follows::::
1) First and the foremost they don't have a valid reason to do that and satisfy the world if dey attack IRAN as it has till now not been proved that IRAN is engaging in nuclear deeds for disaster motive..each time the IAEA visited IRAN for finding nuclear sites dealing with non civil things it faced a defeat ....
2) Secondly , after U.S's invasion of IRAQ people have started pulling off dere hands from supporting US on such matters as the outcome of tht war was disastrous for the integrity of Iraq ...Moreover Dere is a strong unrest even in US parliament also on this move of Mr President of US
3) Thirdly , There is a lot of difference in the Social Status of Talibaan and IRAN ....IRAN enjoys a healthy relation with the ISLAMIC democracies and they will also oppose US for their this act....
4) Fourthly , IRAN is a Big Power and appropriatly a nuclear power so attacking IRAN may prove to be a HISTORIC SLAP to US and its Alies .....
5) Finally , I feel world is sitting on a sack of hay and waiting for a burning splinter to be lighted ....US attack may surely set ground for the third world war which will be FATAL for human civilization in the present era of Nuclear Powers!!!
2007-03-27 07:00:49 · answer #3 · answered by Prince 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'll go with that. It will be a great beginning to actually calming the middle east down from thinking that the rest of us free thinking nations are target practice, since we don't believe in Allah.
2007-03-27 06:53:36 · answer #4 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There does not seem to be any reason for Irans present attitude and it may be necessary to show them how stupid they are .
2007-03-27 06:55:33 · answer #5 · answered by burning brightly 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yea why not.
Iran needs a regime change, and the nation needs to be free of nukes.
2007-03-27 06:47:47 · answer #6 · answered by Villain 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think we can right now, where would we get additional troops from?
not to mention most Iranians like the West, why screw that up for one little nutjob? Let's build bridges to get peace, not kill for peace.
2007-03-27 06:58:07 · answer #7 · answered by guy o 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, there you go wanting to attack Iran again.
2007-03-27 06:50:15 · answer #8 · answered by snowball45830 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes, you hit the front line first, moron
2007-03-27 07:00:04 · answer #9 · answered by einzelgaenger08 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋