he was so so brave to attack Iraq because of the weapons of mass destruction biz but now N.K. possesses them, so why doesn't Dubya rush into war now? geeez I am so confused, he was a tough cowboy macho amigo to save the world and now he cowards like a dog. Whats up with that man? I though he had more balls than that?
I bet most answers I get out of this question is "Its up to the UN to decide" like duh what a stupid answer...so why didnt the bush wipes do that before? instead of massing troops ahead of time at the borders of Iraq? he was going to attack them regardless of the UN's approval or not soooo why dont he get his cowboy boots on now and kick butt with N.K. ?
2007-03-26 22:11:34 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Jasin: What a wimp bush wipe answer, always picking on the small kid on the block ÏRAN" come on bushy where is your balls?
B.t,w way what a nice avatar...sunflower what a peaceful symbolic reflection of your hate.
2007-03-26 22:17:00 · update #1
He doesn't invade North Korea BECAUSE it's proven they have nukes. North Korea has had nukes for a few years now - they had nukes well before the Iraq War.
If the US tried to invade a nuclear North Korea, the North Koreans could potentially nuke Japan. (They don't have trans-continental missiles yet but they can certainly reach that far). Millions of innocent people would die, regional tensions would be set alight and one of the world's major financial centres (Tokyo) would be destroyed, causing economic catastrophe for the entire world.
By contrast, Bush invaded Iraq because they didn't have nukes YET and he wanted to prevent them getting them.
Don't forget that the US has already fought a war against North Korea and lost. The Soviet Union is no longer there to support the North Koreans but China (which is a nuclear power and a fellow Communist nation) wouldn't be very happy if the US tried to do such a thing. It would be a bloody and awful conflict.
I think the war in Iraq has turned out really badly for the US and Bush is belatedly realising that maybe the UN does have a role to play after all. Not that he'll admit that he's wrong, of course.
2007-03-27 02:58:21 · answer #1 · answered by Dragonfly 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don't you mean the opposite? Why aren't N.K. attacking the U.S.? Everyone knows that the U.S. has been holding onto nukes for a long time now and has dropped 2 atomic bombs in the past.
Collectively, we're going to have to find a way to wipe the U.S. from the face of the Earth. Let's be careful about it though, because we need to make sure we leave Canada and Mexico in prestine condition.
2007-03-26 22:22:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
You fool! if they have nukes than they could nuke us!! although there is huge military security... and we are at war with the middle East as well! the U.S. doesn't need more enemies right now. And, China is another Communist nation, they wouldn't approve of us nuking N.K.
I agree with you though, Bush is a weirdo.
By the way, why do you talk about things like " he has no balls." is that like relating to manliness?
2007-03-26 23:28:51 · answer #3 · answered by Fish 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
can you imagined if Bush have four nations doing wars with him at the same time who will likely to win without lose a soldiers ?
the Russians and the Chinese are going to give away weapons until the US start ww3 so he can gets even footing again
2007-03-26 22:31:34 · answer #4 · answered by kimht 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you want true parity between NK and Iraq then there is still well over a year and a whole lot of UN resolutions to go before they have received as much heads up as Iraq did.
There is also a huge super power (china) very near by who seems to WANT to be the one to rein in NK. Afterall, this IS China's mess AND their playground.
I am far more concerned with Iran than with NK.
2007-03-26 22:16:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Coz hes not such a cowboy... he would never attack a country that actually really poses a threat to the US..
2007-03-26 22:30:54 · answer #6 · answered by feel_like 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
We're running out of Military personal to protect OUR country in there was a crisis.....who will he send to N.Korea?
This president has screwed up royally.
2007-03-27 01:56:40 · answer #7 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Presidents don't attack countries, countries do the attacking.
2007-03-26 22:48:53 · answer #8 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because, we are going to attack Iran first.
2007-03-26 22:14:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
to dangerous, we only threaten the unarmed.
2007-03-27 14:49:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋