Thousand? Million?
2007-03-26 19:34:30 · 22 answers · asked by Cereal Killer 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
It would be difficult but yes. Only if I knew 100% that it was the only way.
2007-03-26 19:39:56 · answer #1 · answered by Pseudonym 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We would have to first assume the others would die if the one child did not which your question does not clearly state.
Also would I actually be doing the killing or does the one child die on his/her own without help from me.
Did any of you ever watch Ultraviolet? The one death would be assumed to save the masses but in truth was going to be used against the masses. The question of course would be how do you know the many would be saved because of the one.
I imagine you are also asking this because of the Hitler, Beethoven, etc... philosophical question pertaining to abortion.
One of the big questions is why is the woman the only person allowed to choose if the baby lives (in other words why are their not paternal rights as well)?
Also why is a woman is allowed to kill her baby but if someone is convicted of assaulting a pregnant woman and the fetus dies the convicted assaulter gets convicted of murder?
For those who believe in Christianity, God had his son killed to save the masses.
2007-03-26 19:42:27 · answer #2 · answered by playmkr278 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would kill an innocent child just to kill someone and get away with it. Human life has no intrinsic value be it innocent or corrupt.
2007-03-26 19:46:59 · answer #3 · answered by stolen_watch 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
I'd be too concerned that the '1' I killed could have been the next Thomas Edison, when all the others could have been the next Timothy McVeigh.
2007-03-26 19:44:52 · answer #4 · answered by Sparky5115 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
im sorry i cant imagine killing an innocent child even to save the world
2007-03-26 19:36:50 · answer #5 · answered by dee_the_genius 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
a million. the government IS a serial killer that purely kills people who've committed terrible crimes. 2. Killing somebody who can’t be convicted in incorrect because guy or woman is harmless till shown in charge. How ought to each and each guy or woman verify they have been quite killing a in charge guy or woman?
2016-12-15 09:49:24 · answer #6 · answered by vannostrand 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I had to do it in the Vietnam war. Just because they MIGHT have a bomb strapped under their clothes. Just to save a couple of my buddies. so Yes I would if it would save MORE lives.
2007-03-26 19:42:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
if the hundred/thousand/million/zillion are worth to be saved.
2007-03-26 19:40:46 · answer #8 · answered by ≈ ฬ ≈ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Cmon..we want to save the other hundred.i think that's worth...but that in the case we don't have any choice..i ll pick the worse of em all.
2007-03-26 19:39:24 · answer #9 · answered by the_game 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
difficult question but to kill a child or generally someone is not easy
2007-03-26 19:37:22 · answer #10 · answered by Mag 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋