is there any possible way she will become president????? we need a change in this world.. i approve her!!! how about u?
2007-03-26 18:47:18 · 19 answers · asked by ? 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
i'd vote for her. could it get any worse?
2007-03-26 18:59:08 · answer #1 · answered by Active Denial System™ 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
...Never, not ever. She and her husband are accomplished liars who managed to escape jail, thanks in part to spineless Republicans. Her husband's administration was a scandal a week, and it was a national embarrassment and low point in American politics.
...Whenever she speaks, whatever comes out is shallow, without substance, and leaves her enough wiggle room so she can change her story. And what experience does she have? Being first lady counts for nothing. She is a twice-elected senator in a state not her own.
...I cannot fathom her as commander-in-chief of the greatest military in the world.
...She is planning to try her power grab again (universal health care), so the bureaucrats can take over 1/7 of the American economy. It will mean rationed health care, and long waits for needed procedures. And, if approved, it will be for everybody, from cradle to grave, and it will not matter if you live responsibly or not - everyone will get the same.
...May God have mercy on America. C'mon Mr. Newt!
2007-03-28 22:01:14 · answer #2 · answered by carson123 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is a flip-flopping ***** who isn't smart enough to be president. I am neither a Democrat or Republican but I would rather see Obama president than Hillary and I surely have no love for Obama. I prefer Giuliani if he will run. If Hillary runs and wins then there is no longer any hope for America.
2007-03-27 02:23:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is NO WAY she will make it. Did you hear today she was talking that if she becomes president Slick Willie will rule the world She would appoint him to the UN.
No I don't approve of her and I am being nice by saying it that way!
Could anyone actually stand that screeching voice for 4 years?
2007-03-27 01:59:08 · answer #4 · answered by Kye H 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Oracleof.. got her political name calling mixed up.
Republicans are the kool-aid drinkers, democrats are the tin foil hat wearers....Geez....;>
This Ron Paul is going to make some positive waves.
I am a life long democrat / green party / independent...
Yet in 08' the hot ticket is either Ron Paul or Mccain.
Seeing that I like both of them however, and that I would actually cast a republican vote for one of those guys, well another Dark prince in Guliani will probably get the nom.
With his dead eyes, bland and hypnotic message, and history of corporate sponsorship with an apparant disdain for civil liberty.... We will probably get to pick between him and Hillary - so that no matter who wins it will drive this country into deeper polarization and self-loathing.
On the flip-side, Jon or Ron vs Biden or Barack (to me) is win-win.
You can see it in their eyes, hear it in their voice.
Guliani and Hillary are both jacked.
They are screwed up in the head and it shows in the eyes.
They both have high dollar professional "talking points" and not much else to offer. Its disgusting. We have had 8 years of "lights on but nobody's home"...I am still in shock that the dems ran freaking Kerry, unless they actually wanted to lose.
Anyway - Democrats for John Mccain in '08!
2007-03-27 02:01:22 · answer #5 · answered by Nicholas J 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. We need a change for the better and thats not Hillary or Obama.
Their sissified ideas of a communist utopia will bankrupt the working class, destroy what national security we have.. and erode the bill of rights.
2007-03-27 01:55:40 · answer #6 · answered by . 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Individual freedom is the dream of our age. It's what our leaders promise to give us, it defines how we think of ourselves and, repeatedly, we have gone to war to impose freedom around the world. But if you step back and look at what freedom actually means for us today, it's a strange and limited kind of freedom.
Politicians promised to liberate us from the old dead hand of bureaucracy, but they have created an evermore controlling system of social management, driven by targets and numbers. Governments committed to freedom of choice have presided over a rise in inequality and a dramatic collapse in social mobility. And abroad, in Iraq and Afghanistan, the attempt to enforce freedom has led to bloody mayhem and the rise of an authoritarian anti-democratic Islamism. This, in turn, has helped inspire terrorist attacks in Britain. In response, the Government has dismantled long-standing laws designed to protect our freedom.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctwo/noise/?id=trap
2007-03-27 09:24:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If she wins, I'd say that would be a good time to give up television, and I'd have to wait at least four more years before a woman would be president of the USA.
2007-03-27 02:14:30 · answer #8 · answered by madrom 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
One change we need is that they return the art of spelling to public education.
And capitalization.
And I'm not really sure you are helping her, but maybe you are. The only way she gets my vote is if Republicans nominate a Liberal. If there's going to be a Liberal in the Whitehouse, it should be a Democrat.
2007-03-27 02:12:35 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If she were the party's choice in 2008 I would vote for Jack the Ripper before I would vote for a Republican! So Yes!
2007-03-27 02:00:09 · answer #10 · answered by cantcu 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
People who are dyed in the wool Democrats will vote for her. But she has too much going against her for me.
2007-03-27 02:06:31 · answer #11 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋