2007-03-26 18:17:44 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Probably. And sadly. The U.S. only gets involved with other countries when its national interests are at stake (or- ahem- the country has something we want). That's why no one did anything during the Rwanda crisis.
2007-03-26 19:23:08 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The US doesn't have the troops, since Darfur is around the size of Texas. (thats big if you dont know)
2007-03-27 02:07:24 · answer #2 · answered by thisdogischinese 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We were attacked , so at the present moment we are busy liberating the Iraqi people & putting the kibosh on terrorism .
What's with the subversive propaganda ? Do you hate America - or just our President ?
2007-03-27 01:27:19 · answer #3 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Very doubtfull the US military at this time has its hands full at a later date maybe.
2007-03-27 01:27:52 · answer #4 · answered by firetdriver_99 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
would the people have been oppressed in the first place;
but for that cursed oil and the morals of those who trade in it?
2007-03-27 01:26:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why are the people begging for the U.S. to invade Sudan and stop mass killing and brutality often the same people who are angry that the U.S. invaded Iraq to stop mass killing and brutality?
2007-03-27 01:32:02 · answer #6 · answered by robot_hooker 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sure, check out Angola.
2007-03-27 01:21:37 · answer #7 · answered by s. k 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How do you know there is not oil there?
2007-03-29 14:02:39 · answer #8 · answered by ringolarry 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you bet ye,,
2007-03-27 21:58:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋