- like he is by liberal conspiracy theorists since 9/11 ? Is it because they realize the whole thing is absurd - and they are doing all they can just to be subversive...not factual ?
2007-03-26 17:48:31 · 9 answers · asked by missmayzie 7 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
C.G.-I think you are in the wrong question ..Please read it again . Thanks .
2007-03-26 18:03:40 · update #1
Because they know the truth, it was actually Clinton and Gore's plan!!! The first WTC attack happened under Clinton, and he (Clinton) promised to get the ones responsible, that was his pal bin Laden. Then there was the attack on the USS Cole, it was also under Clinton's administration. Again he said he would get those responsible, again his pal bin Laden!
The 9/11 attack was planned to deflect attention from Gores' poor ability to lead. Clinton tried to stop the attack (which is why you hear so much about that the government knew) but it was too late. Clinton no longer had access to bin Laden's phone number, it had been accidentally shredded when Clinton's administration sabotaged the incoming Bush administration. Also remember that at least three times Clinton could have eliminated bin Laden. Why didn’t he do it, because bin Laden was needed for Clinton's plan to keep the US citizens dumb and not focused on what a poor job he had actually done
According to many Bush haters our current president isn't smart, but Clinton is one of the smartest presidents ever. He defiantly had the brains to mastermind such a conspiracy.
Maybe you’re all just gullible as well.
2007-03-29 09:36:12 · answer #1 · answered by rz1971 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I dont think anyone would fall for that given that Neither George Bush was close to being in office at the time of the first. That's all on Clinton so are the Embassies in Africa & the Barracks attacks in Saudi Arabia, the US Cole & at least 8 other terrist attacks by foreign terriorists. Clinton cut the miltary funding & the militaries readiness & man power which has come back to bite us unfortunately for Bush he's the one that was forced into a war that ended up showing how clinton screwed America & not just Monica.
2007-03-26 18:40:05 · answer #2 · answered by bpeter3196 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Clinton has been out of place of work for 8 ******* years. God, if somebody brings up something Bush did 3 weeks in the past the stunning tries to brush aside it as "previous information". the quantity of time and not applying a terrorist attack interior the U. S., after the 1993 WTC bombing, grew to become into longer under Clinton than has been the submit 9/11 era under Bush. in case you % to play video games and redefine the definition of "terrorist assaults" then look at assaults on American hobbies in Greece, in Syria as properly as countless assaults in Iraq which, for the reason that we've been now no longer at war with Iraq, might desire to in basic terms be defined as terrorist incidents. And shall we no longer forget approximately assaults on 2 of our substantial allies, Spain and the united kingdom and distinctive different assaults international extensive the place individuals have been focused and/or killed.. to respond to your question, no. It would not coach that Bush did a element. in case you look on the info you notice that Bush has certainly made the priority worse with the help of finding out to invade Iraq.
2016-10-20 12:49:43 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was on vaction in New York, with all the distraction on the first attempt, he was able to single handidly plant the thermalite in the towers, knowing full well he would be president.
2007-03-27 07:54:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because of FOX. Rove has made sure that bush is impenetrable as a "wartime president". "Don't criticize your leader in a time of war." Its absurd.
2007-03-26 17:53:34 · answer #5 · answered by C.G. Triggs 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
ask more why didnt that fire collapse it
it was a much hotter longer fire
it exposed the curse of the asbestosis that cost 2 billions to remove but couldnt get insurance
then the rents wernt falling
but think it didnt fall down then
besides that was a us neo con [christian] from the looney tunes neo con right[homie grown right wing terror ,not mossad
2007-03-26 18:31:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I wish I could give you thousands of points/thumbs-up for that one! Great question and great point!
2007-03-26 17:57:18 · answer #7 · answered by robot_hooker 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
probley for the same reason YOU were'nt blamed for that.
2007-03-26 18:06:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah! Why not!
2007-03-26 17:56:19 · answer #9 · answered by Susan M 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋