English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

The Elite. They'd just sit back and watch everyone kill each other.

Who do you think created the fake left/right paradigm?

2007-03-26 19:01:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

A second civil war in this country wouldn't be divided between republicans and democrats. Who ever controlled the nation's government would also control it's armed forces. Few if any soldiers would desert with their arms to the rebellion. With the ban on assault weapons and explosives being so effective thus far, an armed resistance would have little choice but to use guerrilla tactics. Even if the Democrats controlled the Federal government, it's army would be made up of mostly Republicans blindly loyal to the powers that be. The "war" would amount to Republican versus Republican in such a scenario (I believe this is the only scenario, since Democrats would merely protest in the opposite scenario).

2007-03-26 16:55:54 · answer #2 · answered by Michael E 5 · 1 0

The Federalists technically received. The south in the course of the Civil warfare became a Confederacy that needed to allow their states keep thier own regulations as effective sufficient. Republicans by call are were a Liberal party interior the 1860's and they championed for the Union to keep that's federal governmental equipment to take administration over the southern states. The Federal 'Union' type equipment we use in the present day is the reason each little thing in united states seems similar in the course of the state lines, like interstate higways, we've shared numerous regulations and funding by potential of the significant authorities because 1865. Democrats used to regulate the south earlier the 1970's and were extremly conservative. data of this may nicely be cutting-edge in election records previous to the 1970's. the most concentration of both significant activities switched round that aspect, and they grew to change into Liberal Dems and Conservative GOP interior the finest quarter of the twentieth century. The Liberal Republican Federal authorities of the Union of northern states received the Civil warfare. I imagine interior the destiny no man or woman will win. we are so a ways stronger in warfare that we would might want to separate diplomatically or face entire chaos on the line till the finest man or woman has killed or died. i does no longer strive against for a damaged US. i'm finished with that.

2016-10-17 21:28:53 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Probably Republicans, because they are all into bearing of arms. But also, the Democrats could win, because most of the North is very liberal/Democratic, and it is much more industralized than the South, which is predominantly conservative. It all depends on what aspects you look at, I guess. Some are in favor of one, some are in favor of the other. I guess it kinda balances out.

2007-03-26 16:49:25 · answer #4 · answered by Aaron K 2 · 1 2

Individual freedom is the dream of our age. It's what our leaders promise to give us, it defines how we think of ourselves and, repeatedly, we have gone to war to impose freedom around the world. But if you step back and look at what freedom actually means for us today, it's a strange and limited kind of freedom.



Politicians promised to liberate us from the old dead hand of bureaucracy, but they have created an evermore controlling system of social management, driven by targets and numbers. Governments committed to freedom of choice have presided over a rise in inequality and a dramatic collapse in social mobility. And abroad, in Iraq and Afghanistan, the attempt to enforce freedom has led to bloody mayhem and the rise of an authoritarian anti-democratic Islamism. This, in turn, has helped inspire terrorist attacks in Britain. In response, the Government has dismantled long-standing laws designed to protect our freedom.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctwo/noise/?id=trap

2007-03-27 01:56:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The Republicans, because the Democrats would cut and run. They will set a specific pull out date and the Republicans can just sit back and wait for that date and then take over.

2007-03-26 16:48:15 · answer #6 · answered by TE 5 · 5 3

Democrats. Because they will acquire the biggest budget from tax proceeds. Republicans do have better ammunition, true. But they will soon run out of money to buy the bullets.

2007-03-26 16:56:45 · answer #7 · answered by OC 7 · 0 2

The Russians, Chinese, Venezuela, Cuba, and all of the gun manufacturers of the world, including U.S. gunmakers.

However, neither the republicans nor the democrats would be real winners.

2007-03-26 16:49:25 · answer #8 · answered by krollohare2 7 · 1 1

Democrats! republican's are filled with old fat men who don't care about anyone else but themsevles! A new generation has arisen and guess what, they're democrats. With youth on our side and brains we'll kick some republican, snobby, over religious butt.

Congress set a pull out date because (like a person with average intelligence) we have seen no results in Iraq!!!

2007-03-26 16:57:03 · answer #9 · answered by music.lover 2 · 1 4

Whoever controls the military wins.. and there are relatively few democrats in the military.

2007-03-26 17:07:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers