i think tna is better they have better names and they even have bill goldberg and soon they will get rey and chavo blues they have lax i think those guys are the best.
2007-03-26 16:03:12 · 6 answers · asked by juan 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
hey Jaun, they don't have goldberg yet. Rey is going to stay put and Chavo maybe leaving.
2007-03-26 16:12:39 · answer #1 · answered by Dawgma-Texan for Life. TX Pride. 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As I've stated many times b4, TNA has better in ring action, WWE has better story lines. TNA does not have Goldberg and it doesn't look like Rey is going to TNA either.
2007-03-26 16:13:53 · answer #2 · answered by HULK RULES!! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They have bill goldberg on their?
Well i think wwe, only because i don't really watch tna that much, but it's probably just as good.
2007-03-26 16:08:41 · answer #3 · answered by kimberly 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Goldberg is going to TNA?! Oh man :(, personally I like raw better for the most part their mic skills and acting are better. But hey that's your opinon.
2007-03-26 16:16:58 · answer #4 · answered by Dog Lover 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm, I agree now since WWE doesn't have any good champions or story-lines or tag-teams anymore. TNA has amazing tag-teams like Team 3D, LAX, AMW(not anymore), DITR, The Naturals. They have Kurt Angle & Sting, and SAMOA JOE! They even have the Mexican Legend KONAN. WWE has great legends and great potential, but their just shoved around and have no connection whatsoever.
2007-03-28 06:39:09 · answer #5 · answered by Eternal Carnage 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
tna is very extreme and wwe is a little more subdued, i cant stand King Booker, he is so gay
2007-03-26 16:10:52 · answer #6 · answered by moose 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋