2007-03-26 15:16:25 · 9 answers · asked by Koozie 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Good point, and why did the bad guys only shoot at his chest, and never at his head or legs? For some reason, the writers must have thought that it was less violent to see bullets and guns ricocheting off his chest than his head. Go figure.
Here's another one for you. Why is it that when a chandelier or other heavy object is falling on someone from directly above, they throw their arms in front of them to protect themselves, yet continue to look at the object as they scream in abject terror, and make no attempt to move out of the way? The normal reflexive move would be to throw one's arms up for protection, but to cower away from the object and offer the back to take the blow. What they do in the films is totally unnatural. But it makes for a great terror in the eyes scene.
2007-03-26 15:30:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dramatic Affect
2007-03-26 15:20:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because a thrown gun would hit him in the head, and Superman has a soft head.
2007-03-26 15:20:35 · answer #3 · answered by lollipop 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because the gun is made out of kriptnite it kills him also it isnt in the script to get hit with the gun
2007-03-26 15:23:48 · answer #4 · answered by tom56071 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its not cool to get hit with a gun
2007-03-26 15:19:44 · answer #5 · answered by wesnaw1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ET, instinct
2007-03-26 15:20:26 · answer #6 · answered by STA-TOW 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmmm...good question.
2007-03-26 15:19:36 · answer #7 · answered by Robert B 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he was fine tuning his reflexes.
2007-03-26 15:19:49 · answer #8 · answered by debijean 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
idk thts a good question
2007-03-26 15:21:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋