Does anybody believe Conservapedia is an unbiased source of information? I've read numerous articles about all the weapons of mass destruction US troops destroyed in Iraq, how France is such a deceitful place, how Canadians are welfare bums who have 'smaller brains' and how Saddam Hussein planned and financed 911. I've also read the terrorist got into the US through Nova Scotia, that there are close ties between Iraq, North Korea and Iran.
2007-03-26 15:06:15 · 10 answers · asked by USA_USA_USA 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Read the talk page on the Evolution page... it's just too funny.
I don't think anyone can or will ever take it seriously. If they had factual evidence in there, perhaps. but the very premise is flawed- Wikipedia has no bias, because anyone can edit it! It evens out to a neutral POV because of that- it also keeps the facts straight. One cannot omit facts and expect it to stay that way because those are the ideas that support yours. the other side will add their facts as well. And there are lots of people on with no interest in political points, but try ad keep people from vandalizing.
On conservipedia, they have eliminated most of those basic fact checks. It's pitiful, really.
2007-03-26 15:12:55 · answer #1 · answered by The Big Box 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I've never heard of it until now. But, hey, people are using YouTube as a reason to believe the government is behind 9/11, right? It takes all kinds.
2007-03-26 22:22:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Conservapedia is the most ridiculous site I have ever seen. any entry about animals references the myth of Noah and the ark as scientific fact for the origin of different types of species. Its only value is for entertainment about how stupid the Christian-Right is.
2007-03-27 22:10:11 · answer #3 · answered by nckobra40 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Can we take the DNC serious you had Dean thinking at one time Bush did 9/11.
2007-03-26 22:15:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nobody with an IQ higher than room temperature.
2007-03-26 22:16:03 · answer #5 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's about as unbiased as Wikipedia. To each his own. Personally, I trust very little that is found on the internet, but I'm sure they are appreciating that you are getting the word out. I had never heard of them before. They'll probably get some hits tonight thanks to you.
2007-03-26 22:09:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
About as unbiased as NBC, ABC, CBS or any of the other Liberal media outlets.
Everyone needs to have their lies spoon fed to them, it is just taking the Conservative side a bit longer to accomplish this than the liberals. In the future Conservatives (false conservatives) will be as brain washed as those on the left side.
2007-03-26 22:11:50 · answer #7 · answered by jirwin7211 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I've heard all of that on yahoos answer:)
2007-03-26 22:17:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. however not all is BS, just most of it.
2007-03-26 22:09:54 · answer #9 · answered by vituperative facetious wiseass 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Propoganda... so no.
2007-03-26 22:09:54 · answer #10 · answered by Ben D 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋